Originally Posted by
jellobrains
Thanks for reminding me to go out and see what was up with the Friendly Rookie Thrift Inept Board.
So what was this 3.8 MILLION dollar trading cost for the I fund in July 08??? And I don't understand this on page 3 last paragraph:
"... Trading costs for the I Fund were $2.8 million in July. These costs stemmed from a $200 million trade made before the 4th of July but not executed until July 7th. This single trade cost $3.8 million to execute."
So a trade cost 3.8 million, but total costs were 1 million LESS????
Believe it or not, trading the "I" fund costs money but, based on trade amount and number of trades, there are sometimes "credits" applied. I am interested on why the difference would be 1 million dollars.
What I like in the minutes are:
Ms. Ray reviewed the August 8, 2008 memorandum (attached), entitled "July 2008 Performance Review - G, F, C, S,I, and L Funds."
She noted that the I Fund had a tracking error of 54 basis points, primarily due to a fair value adjustment. What did she think we should do about it????
Twopoint four billion dollars were transferred into the G Fund in July. Mr. Sanchez remarked that no matter how much we try to educate our participants, many of them still chase after yesterday's news.
Um, I was planning on this crash happening back then????? Just not smart enough to be out by then?
Mr. Sanchez noted that he enjoyed reading the columns written by Mike Causey, a reporter on theFederal beat. What did he like about them????
The bright spot is the L Fund balances continue to grow and, in particular, in the longer dated funds. This may demonstrate that younger TSP participants are viewing the TSP as a long-term plan.
Or the new system creates a field of sheep. "So sayeth the shepherd, SO SAYETH THE FLOCK!!" mentality.
Bookmarks