It's called Barclay's Math.
The L 2010 share price of $13.3647 is higher than L Income ($12.4703). With a loss of 10.57% compared to 5.43% for the L Income, can someone explain how L 2010 which has twice as many shares of S and I funds as well as more shares of the C fund can have higher share prices than the L income? All the share prices decrease beginning with L 2040 to L Income with the exception of L 2010.
Thanks
It's called Barclay's Math.
CURRENT ALLOCATION = 100% G
Fear is the greatest buy signal ever seen in the stock markets - Birchtree
The (L) Funds consist of the (G)(F)(C)(S)(I) Funds, I assume that the
cost of rebalancing plays a large role. As of yesterday, the average cost
to buy 1 share of each of the individual funds equaled to 11.67242 per share.
Thats slightly higher then the (L)2040's 11.5700 per share and alot
lower then the other share prices within the (L) Funds.
CURRENT ALLOCATION = 100% G
Fear is the greatest buy signal ever seen in the stock markets - Birchtree
Greg she was using thur the end of October.
http://tsp.gov/rates/monthly-current.html
CURRENT ALLOCATION = 100% G
Fear is the greatest buy signal ever seen in the stock markets - Birchtree
S&P500 (C Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
EFA (I Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
BND (F Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
||
Yahoo Finance Realtime TSP Fund Tracking Index Quotes |
Bookmarks