About 2% annually:
https://www.tsp.gov/InvestmentFunds/...alReturns.html
Assuming a 3-fund portfolio, is there any good reason not to allocate all of one's bond $$ to the G Fund, and eliminate the F Fund altogether?
About 2% annually:
https://www.tsp.gov/InvestmentFunds/...alReturns.html
Subscriber info: Intrepid Timer Premium Talk | System Signals posted here l FAQ about email alerts l
For a set it and forget it type of allocation, an equal split between F & G may not be a bad idea. The L funds allocate a lot less to F than G but as the data that I_T linked to points out, the F fund continues to outperform G. We are supposedly in a rising rate environment this year and F continue to outperform G as well.
Plus the gov't doesn't 'borrow' from the F-fund.
Tom
Market Commentary | My Blog | TSP Talk Plus | |
I am not a Registered Investment Advisor and this is not investment advice. Please do your own due diligence.
S&P500 (C Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
EFA (I Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
BND (F Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
||
Yahoo Finance Realtime TSP Fund Tracking Index Quotes |
Bookmarks