Likes Likes:  0
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 48

Thread: GOP attack FERS

  1. #25

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    6,312

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Quote Originally Posted by FireWeatherMet View Post
    Phil emailed me and sent his response (attached)
    Not sure if this will work.
    ROFLMAO

    You win!

  2.  
  3. #26

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Quote Originally Posted by James48843 View Post
    No, you are not correct.
    If you are seeing 1.3%, I think you may be a law enforcement person who pays slightly more into the system.

    The rest of us pay 0.8% into the system, and that does NOT count the employer's share.


    FERS works like this:

    The employer (Uncle Sam) conteributes 11.5% of your salary to the fund.

    You, as an employee, contribute 0.8% to the FERS fund.

    The fund then pays you , based on the number of years, ABOUT 1% for each year that you work, UNLESS you retire AFTER age 62. If you retire after age 62, it's 1.1% for each year.

    So, for example, if your minimum retirement age is, say 57, and you work 30 years PRIOR to age 57, and retire at age 57, then you'd get 30% of your final 3 years annual pay each year as a FERS retirement.

    By law, FERS must calculate each year whether it has or does not have sufficeint funding to pay all anticipated retirement obligations. If it beleives it will be short, it can ask for an INCREASED employee contribution. The FERS system got MORE than 0.8% from employees each year from the time it was established, until about 2004 or so, at which time the fund was determinted to be fully funded, and employee contribution was reduced to 0.8%.

    So no, there is no 1.3% number. In order to get the same amount of money back out of a TSP type fund, you'd have to deposit, on the order of the same 11.5% employer share AND a 0.8% employee share, FOR 30 YEARS, in order to pay out 30% of your high-3 salary for the rest of your life.

    What the republicans were initially proposing was reducing the amount paid out by FERS to use the high-five rather than the high-three in the calcuation. That would reduce the payout by perhaps 5% for each person, but would have no effect on the fund balance, since the amount going in- the 11.5% employer share, and the 0.8% employee share, would not change.

    What Senator Burr is now proposing, is DOING AWAY WITH FERS ALTOGHER, and chopping off that 11.5% employer contribution that Uncle Sam now makes to each employee's FERS account.

    That's Burr's proposal.
    well i'll take whatever free money they're handing out now, and then i'll take whatever they want to hand out later, and i'll also keep working for my bread, because that's the best way to get something to eat, plus it's entirely under my control, and there's no complicated formula for that, it just works.
    100g

  4.  
  5. #27

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    Posts
    1,648

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    excellent points.
    Thx Allie, James, and FWM for stirring the soup.


  6.  
  7. #28

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boiled Peanut, Georgia, USA
    Posts
    76,611

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    By the way CSRS paid 7% of salary, I did it for 34.5 years!



  8.  
  9. #29

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Quote Originally Posted by nnuut View Post
    By the way CSRS paid 7% of salary, I did it for 34.5 years!
    you mean 7% x 34.5 yrs = 241.5 percent years? what the heck is all that about? this math stuff gets me all confused.

    i hope i get to retire someday.
    100g

  10.  
  11. #30

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boiled Peanut, Georgia, USA
    Posts
    76,611

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Just a tiny bit more than .8%. nerd.gif



  12.  
  13. #31

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Bush, Louisiana
    Posts
    110

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Well as I read it, it would only affect those hired after 2012. So who cares? Besides, I'm already getting mine.

  14.  
  15. #32

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,619

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Listen to the voice of reason. It's the natural order of things, if the private sector is eliminating private pensions due to a enormous supply of unemployed labor in this country or world wide, Chindia. Remember your lesson in Supply & Demand, pensions were offered decades ago to entice skilled laborers to come to work for XYZ company because of a skilled labor shortage. That is not the case anymore, China, India, Mexico, Brazil, etc.

    Why would the private citizen taxpayer want to pay for a much, much, much, better benefit for government employee's than they are getting in the private sector? DUH! And, by the way..................we have a $14,000,000,000,000 debt. HELLLLOOOO!!!!!!

    Change is coming you better be on the right side of it. Austerity will be a bit$h when it comes and it will come.
    Socrates: "Democracy, which is a charming form of government, full of variety and disorder, and dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequaled alike."

  16.  
  17. #33

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,619

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Side note, be very happy with what you have in benefits but keep you mouth shut or you will be a target of hate and envy. This can make your personnel and professional life hell if you anger the wrong citizen.
    Socrates: "Democracy, which is a charming form of government, full of variety and disorder, and dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequaled alike."

  18.  
  19. #34

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,619

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Change to the Federal retirement system will be coming, bet on it. It is already starting at my work with my Union. My Union officials seem to be seeing the writing on the wall and are making huge concessions to new hires and part time workers. Stay off the radar and do what's good for the Country as a whole, its called SACRIFICE.
    Socrates: "Democracy, which is a charming form of government, full of variety and disorder, and dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequaled alike."

  20.  
  21. #35

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Quote Originally Posted by FireWeatherMet View Post
    "Who cares about anyone else...I got mine...thats all that counts."

    I could guess your political affiliation, but Tom asked us to keep things neutral, so I will abide.

    But if you are getting yours than its likely CSRS, which, along with optional TSP since 1987 is one of , if not the best deal around. Congrats.
    Wha?? Thats an asshat comment, it isnt Neutral at all because we know where you are coming from Fireweather... sheesh!
    I like TSPTalk and I think most people here are well-intentioned but if I followed their advice, I'd be hunkered down in my basement with a thousand cans of tuna fish.

  22.  
  23. #36

    Default Re: GOP attack FERS

    Quote Originally Posted by Show-me View Post
    Side note, be very happy with what you have in benefits but keep you mouth shut or you will be a target of hate and envy. This can make your personnel and professional life hell if you anger the wrong citizen.
    If I say I agree with these posts of yours, think I will be a target??
    I like TSPTalk and I think most people here are well-intentioned but if I followed their advice, I'd be hunkered down in my basement with a thousand cans of tuna fish.


  24.  
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
S&P500 (C Fund) (delayed)
GOP attack FERS
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed)
GOP attack FERS
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
EFA (I Fund) (delayed)
GOP attack FERS
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
BND (F Fund) (delayed)
GOP attack FERS
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)

Yahoo Finance Realtime TSP Fund Tracking Index Quotes