Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: I'm retiring as soon as I can: Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency funding

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    144

    Default I'm retiring as soon as I can: Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency funding

    Too bad I don't qualify for early retirement until 2026 when I'm 48.

    Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency funding

    Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency funding

    Civilian agencies would see their budget slashed by billions of dollars and federal employees would be at risk of agency workforce cuts under a budget resolution passed by the Senate May 5.

    The Senate voted to pass the budget 51 to 48, with all Democrats and two Republicans voting against it. The House already passed the resolution April 30.

    The budget calls for about $496 billion in cuts to non-defense spending over a 10-year period, with the cuts starting in 2017. However, the Defense Department would see large increases in spending over that same period, to the tune of about $187 billion.

    While the Defense Department's base budget fits within the automatic budget caps imposed by sequestration, the budget places the additional funding in an "overseas contingency operations" account that is not subject to the budget caps imposed by sequestration.

    Civilian agencies would see a $16 billion cut in 2017, or about $24 billion under a Congressional Budget Office projection.

    House and Senate Republicans have been working to reconcile budget proposals that included significant benefit cuts and plans increase federal employee pension contributions to six percent or more of salaries.
    The original House budget had also included proposals to 10 percent through attrition and increase Postal Service employee contributions to their health insurance premiums as well as decreases the rate of return on the Thrift Savings Plan's government securities fund (G Fund) and encourages the elimination of the Federal Employee Retirement System annuity supplement.

    None of those proposals made it into the final version, which is what the Senate voted on May 5.

    The compromise document does retain a measure that allows the Budget Committee chairman to find ways to revise and update the federal retirement system, but only if those changes did not increase the deficit over a 10-year period.

    The budget proposal also calls upon Congress to pass legislation requiring agencies and programs funded through fees or offsetting collections to be allocated new budget authority every year. The proposal will help increase transparency in agency spending, according to the document.

    The budget also calls for more efficient spending on government IT procurements and programs, saying the federal government could save about $20 billion a year. The budget document also calls for an additional $106 billion in savings by eliminating improper payments.


  2.  
  3. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    3,419

    Default Re: I'm retiring as soon as I can: Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency fund

    This is going to happen - sooner rather than later...

    My biggest complaint is that I would rather not receive a pension and instead have maybe half of those contributions placed in my TSP account instead. Maybe as an extended match to 7% or so. Why should I contribute 6% or 10% of my gross salary to the 'G Fund' and have it permanently allocated to the 'G Fund'. That is what our pension is - and, it does not even fund the pension 'obligations'. This will likely not affect me. The last one affected new hires, but it is a very bad deal.

    Anyway, they need to cut $500 Billion out of Obama's spending to balance the budget and they are squealing about $24 Billion. Out of spending of $3,500 Billion. Cutting 0.7% of the spending is cutting to the bone???

    Finally, see were some of the first cuts are coming from. Those are the easy targets of current politicians. They can plead poverty and renege on promises of past politicians. This is not a true renege because we have no promise of future employment from the gubmint and because pension contribution changes will likely be for new employees - but what happens if we continue to spend a half trillion more than we take in.
    Lookin' up at the 'G Fund'!!!

  4.  
  5. #3

    Default Re: I'm retiring as soon as I can: Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency fund

    I would simply like to have my Social Security Contributions NOW. Let me go my way and invest as I see fit and then let the chips fall where they may. Either I will die a Prince or a Pauper but it will be of my own doing in the name of personal Liberty.

    Instead, people 18 years old are drawing from the pot of SS money that I put into while never contributing to it themselves. Thanks FDR you jack wagon!

    /Rant

    Frank

  6.  
  7. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    3,419

    Default Re: I'm retiring as soon as I can: Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency fund

    Quote Originally Posted by Lakebound View Post
    I would simply like to have my Social Security Contributions NOW. Let me go my way and invest as I see fit and then let the chips fall where they may. Either I will die a Prince or a Pauper but it will be of my own doing in the name of personal Liberty.

    Instead, people 18 years old are drawing from the pot of SS money that I put into while never contributing to it themselves. Thanks FDR you jack wagon!

    /Rant

    Frank
    The L(whatever is one step more risky than LIncome) only fell 10.5% in 2008. It made it up and more within two years. So, give me the option to take my Social Security contributions, the employer match, and the pension contribution (I will definitely offer half of that as a cut) and let me invest it in TSP. Why do I want something like 30% of my gross salary to be contributed to the 'G Fund' and be stuck there forever? Is that really a benefit or is it a Ponzi scheme? The Federal Gubmint borrows the money for a week and rolls that debt into new borrowing next week at an interest rate they define (it is NOT defined by the Fed) and those 'assets' can be monetized every year for the annual fiscal emergency of spending lots more than is brought in. Yeah, that is what I want to invest in.

    By the way, the Federal Gubmint brings in $100 Billion more in revenue (inflation adjusted) than FY2007. It, however, spends $400 Billion more (inflation adjusted) than FY2007. Cut the spending to FY2007 and the budget is close to balance. And, we cannot cut $24 Billion out of expenses when the expenses have bloated $400 Billion. And, yes, both the FY2007 and FY2014 revenue/expense numbers include the war effort - and FY2007 was the surge year. Yowser...

    Yeah, I want to invest in rolling debt at extremely low returns. Sounds good to me
    Lookin' up at the 'G Fund'!!!

  8.  

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
S&P500 (C Fund) (delayed)
I'm retiring as soon as I can: Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency funding
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed)
I'm retiring as soon as I can: Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency funding
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
EFA (I Fund) (delayed)
I'm retiring as soon as I can: Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency funding
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
BND (F Fund) (delayed)
I'm retiring as soon as I can: Senate passes budget slashing civilian agency funding
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)

Yahoo Finance Realtime TSP Fund Tracking Index Quotes