Page 376 of 379 FirstFirst ... 276326366374375376377378 ... LastLast
Results 4,501 to 4,512 of 4540

Thread: nasa1974's Account Talk

  1. #4501

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boiled Peanut, Georgia, USA
    Posts
    59,377

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    Quote Originally Posted by userque View Post
    Facts, not opinions:

    World experienced hottest June on record in 2019, says US agency
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49040058

    Climate Change: How Do We Know?
    https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

    Attachment 44620
    Where is the LIA?
    Little Ice Age (LIA), climate interval that occurred from the early 14th century through the mid-19th century, when mountain glaciers expanded at several locations, including the European Alps, New Zealand, Alaska, and the southern Andes, and mean annual temperatures across the Northern Hemisphere declined by 0.6 °C (1.1 °F) relative to the average temperature between 1000 and 2000 CE. The term Little Ice Age was introduced to the scientific literature by Dutch-born American geologist F.E. Matthes in 1939. Originally the phrase was used to refer to Earth’s most recent 4,000-year period of mountain-glacier expansion and retreat. Today some scientists use it to distinguish only the period 1500–1850, when mountain glaciers expanded to their greatest extent, but the phrase is more commonly applied to the broader period 1300–1850. The Little Ice Age followed the Medieval Warming Period (roughly 900–1300 CE) and preceded the present period of warming that began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.[more]

    https://www.britannica.com/science/Little-Ice-Age
    11/13/2019
    CRUDE Oil =
    $57.12 +$.32

  2.  
  3. #4502

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,885
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    Quote Originally Posted by nnuut View Post
    Where is the LIA?
    Little Ice Age (LIA), climate interval that occurred from the early 14th century through the mid-19th century, when mountain glaciers expanded at several locations, including the European Alps, New Zealand, Alaska, and the southern Andes, and mean annual temperatures across the Northern Hemisphere declined by 0.6 °C (1.1 °F) relative to the average temperature between 1000 and 2000 CE. The term Little Ice Age was introduced to the scientific literature by Dutch-born American geologist F.E. Matthes in 1939. Originally the phrase was used to refer to Earth’s most recent 4,000-year period of mountain-glacier expansion and retreat. Today some scientists use it to distinguish only the period 1500–1850, when mountain glaciers expanded to their greatest extent, but the phrase is more commonly applied to the broader period 1300–1850. The Little Ice Age followed the Medieval Warming Period (roughly 900–1300 CE) and preceded the present period of warming that began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.[more]

    https://www.britannica.com/science/Little-Ice-Age
    Your question is unclear. But if you mean to ask, in effect, 'where is the Little Ice Age on the chart I posted,' then it would be a little to the left of zero. Simply take the dates you posted for the LIA and apply them to the chart I posted.

    Additionally, the chart I posted, created by NASA, deals with CO2, not temperatures or glacier coverage.

    I'm not sure of the point you're trying to make. Could you clearly state your assertion? For example, my original point was that CO2 levels are at extreme all time highs ... and those levels correlate with the advent of the third industrial revolution. Do you disagree with that fact? Do you have a rebuttal? I also noted that the world has seen record temperatures in June. Do you disagree with that fact? Rebuttal?

    You seem to be addressing something I never discussed. That's cool, but maybe start a new thread? I (or others) may or may not have input to a topic other than what I posted about here (I don't respond to every single post on this site...only topics that interest me. I'm not really interested in the LIA, per se. But maybe I would be if you can somehow connect it up to what I did post about ... my quote you included in your LIA post).
    "In the land of idiots, the moron is King."--Unknown

  4.  
  5. #4503

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boiled Peanut, Georgia, USA
    Posts
    59,377

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    Too Political, I quit we have gone over all this before. We are trashing up Nasa's thread.
    11/13/2019
    CRUDE Oil =
    $57.12 +$.32

  6.  
  7. #4504

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,885
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    Quote Originally Posted by nnuut View Post
    Too Political, I quit we have gone over all this before. We are trashing up Nasa's thread.
    Ok nnuut.
    "In the land of idiots, the moron is King."--Unknown

  8.  
  9. #4505

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    9,807

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    I have attached the August information. My thinking right now is to stay in "C" and hold onto my 2 IFT's just incase I have to jump ship. Too many variables right now for my crazy 8 ball to give me an answer on what to do. The "C" fund has done a little better then the other funds but over all not a good month for stocks. Good luck everyone, we may need it.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    May the force be with us.

  10.  
  11. #4506

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    9,807

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    Here is the September information. Not sure what I'm going to do. I might switch from "C" to "S". September isn't a great month but "S" is either really good or really bad. The "I" fund is a possibility but with Brexit and Hong Kong it's a crap shoot. Good luck everyone.

    September.xlsx
    May the force be with us.

  12.  
  13. #4507

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    9,807

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    Gotta buy a new case of sticky pants. This month has depleted my reserves.
    May the force be with us.

  14.  
  15. #4508

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    2,621

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    Quote Originally Posted by nasa1974 View Post
    Gotta buy a new case of sticky pants. This month has depleted my reserves.
    As of yesterdays close, the C Fund up 1.21% for the week, S Fund up 1% and the I Fund up 0.99%. That's not much of a safety margin. Is today the day we turn negative for the week? If so, that makes it 4 weeks in a row for the C and S fund and 7 weeks in a row for the I fund. To the good side though, we only need a gain of 0.33% in the F Fund to be positive.

    Looks like we are in for some more pain...
    I pride myself on the fact that I will never have a cheesy "uplifting" quote in my signature block...Ever!

  16.  
  17. #4509

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    9,807

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    Not sure what to do for September. It's either really good or really bad. With all the geo-political and tariff bs just not sure what to do. I'm thinking "S" fund but a little birdy is chirping "G". I want to make a move Friday so I still have my 2 IFT's for the month.
    May the force be with us.


  18.  
  19. #4510

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    9,807

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    I'm having a hard time making up my mind what to do. ChessGuy moved to "G" this morning and you can't look past a 30.59% YTD. 2 year and 10 year bonds have stabilized a little. I can't remember the last time I went into the "G" fund but I think that is what I'm going to do. Protect my 18.69% YTD. Good luck everyone.
    May the force be with us.

  20.  
  21. #4511

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    9,807

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    Well this is the longest I have sat in the "G" fund in years. Getting antsy to get back into the market. Debating what to do for October. Like September it is usually a questionable month for stocks, but this month has proven different with all the national and international turmoil that was leading up to September. My luck is if I had stayed in stocks my value would have dropped 2%. I really can't complain too much. I'm almost at 19% YTD though my high point was just over 22% a few months back. Sure wish the top 10 in the AutoTracker would post more. Would be nice to know how they are staying close to that 30% profit line and what their thinking is.
    May the force be with us.

  22.  
  23. #4512

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    9,807

    Default Re: nasa1974's Account Talk

    OK, so September has been a little bit of a surprise. Here is the information for October. Congratulations to those that have stuck it out in stocks this month.

    October.xlsx
    May the force be with us.

  24.  
Page 376 of 379 FirstFirst ... 276326366374375376377378 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SPY (C Fund) (delayed)
nasa1974's Account Talk
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed)
nasa1974's Account Talk
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
EFA (I Fund) (delayed)
nasa1974's Account Talk
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
AGG (F Fund) (delayed)
nasa1974's Account Talk
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)