The TNX/MACD sure makes a case for moving to the F Fund while waiting confirmation there is more downside. PROBLEM - AMBAC. Thoughts?
For every buyer there's a seller and here comes the pullback/retest/double bottom.
Dow Transports have about 9% farther to fall in order to test the lows but the Dow Industrials only has about 2% to go. Only one of the two need to hold the line while both will eventually need to make new highs for a new bullish confirmation.
Keep the faith Hessian, once again, the biggest fund outflows are happening at precisely the wrong time.
The TNX/MACD sure makes a case for moving to the F Fund while waiting confirmation there is more downside. PROBLEM - AMBAC. Thoughts?
In a Bear Market it's better to be a sniper than a machine-gunner.
Hi Tomncath,
First, welcome and please recognize, that I consider myself new at all this still. I've been learning now for ~6 mo., and as a result, I'm still first to admit that I'm not comfortable advising others - I just present facts as I see them. That said, as Show-me pointed out, 350z is IMO also, the best souce for info in Bonds, TNX, F-Fund and such info.
Personnally, though I am thinking of placing majority in the F-Fund for Monday - but I will be checking -hoping to hear from 350z on this -if it's still wise at this time -given his opinion that if bail-outs of Bond Insurers occur, this would be bad for the F.
Otherwise, I'm sticking with my plan (& TSP Board's BS limits), which is, I plan to also start dollar-cost-averaging some small amounts into stocks (emphasis on "small amounts"), very soon it seems, perhaps even as soon as Monday.
To your other question, re: AMBAC (expect your question relates also to MBIA, etc). Its anybody's guess right now. Again best source, IMO is 350z, he showed us this issue first, and continues vigilence & advice in his posts. Basically, he's said any bail-out will also be bad for stocks as well (will involve major writedowns). You also heard Chairman Ben himself, saying that: "many Banks will likely fail/go under" - and personally, I think you gotta take his words as likely an understatement of the facts!
IMO, patience will win in the end. Stay frosty, watchful and agile -in the current market, oppportunities, or big losses, can come quick (as this current market can "turn on a dime").
Other factors can also quickly change the market picture, such as: if the PPT actually gets in gear, plus other unforseen factors, or the like of major institutional moves. Currently its like the wild, wild, west -only this time, its financial.
To quote 350z "at least the issues are contained - to the earth!"
VR
Last edited by hessian; 03-01-2008 at 09:30 AM.
Thanks VR. I pulled this from his thread about the TNX/MACD...just thought I'd get your take and others on your thread...trying to balance it all out. Heck, in the interest of hearing from both sides I don't even mind hearing from Birch ...no offense Birch, who loves ya baby
In a Bear Market it's better to be a sniper than a machine-gunner.
I never go near the F fund - too spooky for my taste and very short term oriented.
Thanks Birch, to be honest, F has always given me the heebe-geebes also. Stocks are now coming closer into the range that I was hoping for, so that may be the better move, very soon. Finally, now coming closer, within sight (& maybe still able to maintain TSP's BS 3 IFT/mo limit).
Much Thanks
VR
Thanks guys, and Birch, I do honestly value your input. Everyone here puts balance on the issues. The bigggest problem I have is thinking within a 3 IFT limit when none of us here except Birch is use to this concept.
In a Bear Market it's better to be a sniper than a machine-gunner.
test...
[IMG]CvcuaJy9OwI[IMG]
Last edited by Show-me; 03-08-2008 at 07:09 AM.
Hey BigBull-y,
I'll answer that one. Playing in the F-Fund is much like playing in the stock funds (C, S, I) - you can lose as well as win - and therefore there is better times than others be in it! Uncertainty over the Bond Insurers, plus a plethera of other more normal factors, had it a too hot to play for awhile. Now however some of the factors are looking better - but I agree with Birch its really, and in some ways, more complicated to understand what drives it, and therefore how to predict, therefore never one I ever cared for much either.
- Recomend 1st read backwards a couple weeks in "The F-Fund" thread - as background info.
- Then also do the same in 350ZCommTech's AcctTalk thread - here:
http://www.tsptalk.com/mb/showthread...497#post153497
Only then will you begin to understand some of the main issues, and risks, even now while some folks are now considering to move into it (maybe partial move, anyway), but its never without risk (and needs to be "played" just like any of C, S, I).
VR
and Good Luck!!
PS -- "G" is the only safe/no-risk Fund.
test2
"...a man comes on the TV - telling me more useless information..."
(The guy in the red pants, reminds me of the whipsaw its been all year!)
[IMG]CvcuaJy9OwI[IMG]
CvcuaJy9OwI
Last edited by hessian; 03-08-2008 at 07:42 AM. Reason: darn videos - did I get one right this time? - nope, HELP? (at least the link works, to see it)
S&P500 (C Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
EFA (I Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
BND (F Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
||
Yahoo Finance Realtime TSP Fund Tracking Index Quotes |
Bookmarks