Global Warming is it real?

[nnuut]

The controversy that is causing changes in the way we live, changes to stop "the end of the world". I believe there is warming, but what is the real cause, is it the result of normal changes in the world's weather patterns or is it caused by human actions? :confused:
Buy a GREEN CAR with less CO2 emissions, stop the use of carbon based energy use and do it now!!
What is the REAL ANSWER?:nuts: NO SMOKING Allowed!! Just how many people can you fit in a Clown Car?6346

[nnuut]

Weather Channel Founder Wants To Sue Al Gore For Global Warming Fraud (http://www.infowars.com/weather-channel-founder-wants-to-sue-al-gore-for-global-warming-fraud/)

Paul Joseph Watson (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/031408_warming_fraud.htm)
Prison Planet
Friday, March 14, 2008
http://truthnews.us/images/onepixel.gif Coleman said that any degree of warming that has taken place over the last 25 years is beginning to be offset by a recent cooling trend. China, the largest emitter of carbon dioxide, has just experienced its coldest winter for 100 years (http://uk.reuters.com/article/homepageCrisis/idUKPEK161570._CH_.242020080204).
A landmark court case that would destroy the so-called "consensus" behind man-made global warming could be in the works after Weather Channel founder John Coleman expressed his intention to sue Al Gore for fraud.
Companies that sell "carbon credits" on the basis that they offset carbon emissions could also be in the firing line as Coleman stated his conviction that man-made advocates would lose the case if a fair debate, something that the establishment is loathe to allow, was allowed to take place.
"Since we can’t get a debate, I thought perhaps if we had a legal challenge and went into a court of law, where it was our scientists and their scientists, and all the legal proceedings with the discovery and all their documents from both sides and scientific testimony from both sides, we could finally get a good solid debate on the issue," Coleman said. "I’m confident that the advocates of ‘no significant effect from carbon dioxide’ would win the case."
Coleman said that any degree of warming that has taken place over the last 25 years is beginning to be offset by a recent cooling trend. China, the largest emitter of carbon dioxide, has just experienced its coldest winter for 100 years (http://uk.reuters.com/article/homepageCrisis/idUKPEK161570._CH_.242020080204).
"I think if we continue the cooling trend a couple of more years, the general public will at last begin to realize that they’ve been scammed on this global-warming thing," said Coleman (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,337710,00.html).
http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/images/onepixel.gifhttp://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/images/onepixel.gifhttp://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/images/onepixel.gif
Coleman questioned whether carbon dioxide caused temperature increase, a point borne out by ice core samples that show increases in carbon dioxide in the environment (http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/2006_articles/IceCoreSprg97.pdf) are a result and not a cause of higher temperatures, lagging behind by as much as 800 years.
"Does carbon dioxide cause a warming of the atmosphere? The proponents of global warming pin their whole piece on that," he said.
"The compound carbon dioxide makes up only 38 out of every 100,000 particles in the atmosphere."
"That’s about twice as what there were in the atmosphere in the time we started burning fossil fuels, so it’s gone up, but it’s still a tiny compound," Coleman said. "So how can that tiny trace compound have such a significant effect on temperature?
"My position is it can’t," he continued. "It doesn’t, and the whole case for global warming is based on a fallacy."
Coleman’s call for a court case to take on the global warming orthodox comes in the same week that the Carnegie Institute urged the need to reduce carbon emissions to zero within decades (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/031008_new_proposals.htm), a move that would devastate the third world and likely end human civilization as we know it, returning man back to the stone age.
http://www.infowars.com/weather-channel-founder-wants-to-sue-al-gore-for-global-warming-fraud/

[Buster]

I've been saying all along, that Algore and his likes are all full of chicken poop!

The Earth will do what the Earth has always done..with or without us Humans;)

[nnuut]

UN IPCC Scientist: 'No convincing scientific arguments to support claim that increases in greenhouse gases are harmful to the climate'

Tuesday, May 05, 2009By Marc Morano (http://www.climatedepot.com/contact.asp) – Climate Depot (http://www.climatedepot.com)

Selected excerpts from UN IPCC scientist's recent testimony.
IPCC reviewer and climate researcher and chemist Dr. Vincent Gray of New Zealand is an expert reviewer on every single draft of the IPCC reports going back to 1990 and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of "Climate Change 2001. Dr. Gray's research is featured on page 155 of the 2009 edition of the 255-page "U.S. Senate Minority Report Update: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims" (http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=83947f5d-d84a-4a84-ad5d-6e2d71db52d9)
Below are selected excerpts of his testimony before New Zealand's Committee for the Emissions Trading Scheme Review May 5, 2009:
I am an experienced research chemist, with a PhD from Cambridge 1946, and a long research career in the UK, France, Canada, New Zealand and China. I have over 100 scientific publications, many of them on climate science, which I have studied intensively for the past 18 years.
I have been an Expert Reviewer for the IPCC Reports since the beginning in 1990.I submitted 1,898 comments to the last (fourth) Working Group I (Science) Report.
I was recently invited to the Beijing Climate Center as a Visiting Scholar and I recently lectured to a Conference in New York.
I have reluctantly concluded, after detailed study of the evidence presented by the IPCC, that there are no convincing scientific arguments to support the claim that increases in greenhouse gases are harmful to the climate. [...]
The IPCC “central/benchmark projections” are based on a combination pf ridiculously oversimplified models and unrealistic futures scenarios. The projections themselves conflict with the current fall in global temperatures, the absence of any warming in New Zealand, and the lack of local evidence of sea level change. [...][more]
http://www.climatedepot.com/a/611/UN-IPCC-Scientist-No-convincing-scientific-arguments-to-support-claim-that-increases-in-greenhouse-gases-are-harmful-to-the-climate

[nnuut]

So NOW we are putting our auto makers out of business and taking control of the companies, forcing them to retool and lay off hundred of thousands of Americans to stop Global Warming? I think there are other reasons the Gov't wants CAP and TRADE CONTROL of our energy suppliers, and the huge TAX REVENUE that we will have to pay. Brace yourself folks this one is the beginning of the end, if we let it happen!!:nuts:


U. S. Senate Minority Report:
More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over
Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Scientists Continue to Debunk “Consensus” in 2008 &
2009
(Updates Previous Report: “More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made
Global Warming Claims”)
U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Minority Staff Report (Inhofe)
www.epw.senate.gov/minority (http://www.epw.senate.gov/minority)
Original Release: December 11, 2008
Presented at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Poznan, Poland

Updated: December 22, 2008; January 27, 2009

& March 16, 2009


(Update of the 2007 Report: “Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made

Global Warming Claims in 2007”)

Contact: Marc Morano –






Marc_Morano@EPW.Senate.gov (202) 224-5762


Matthew Dempsey –



Matt_Dempsey@Inhofe.Senate.gov (202) 224-9797
U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee (Minority)[More]
255 pages folks::worried:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=83947f5d-d84a-4a84-ad5d-6e2d71db52d9

[nnuut]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLK-U8kggFk

[nnuut]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpEcPFSEIwQ

[nnuut]

Work Isolating Neutralizer Extract is one answer!:D

[XL-entLady]

Work Isolating Neutralizer Extract is one answer!:D
Usually known by its acronym? Too funny! :laugh:

Lady

[Valkyrie]

if u have the time read this book, and then everything will make sense.

http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/greening.shtml

[nnuut]

I agree and only read the 1st page!!

The Greening
By Larry H. Abraham

"Indeed it is. After reading the report that follows, you will have no doubt that "The Greening" revolution is an essential part of Insider plans. Their goal is not to green the earth...but to rule it.
Here is how they plan to do it."