DrSnacky
02-25-2009, 03:43 PM
In 2008, I resisted bailing out of the C, S and I Funds because I thought people were panicking and did not want to “buy the loss” if I did not get back into the C, S or I funds in time when they rebounded. However, in mid 2008 I began putting all newly allocated funds into F and G but kept existing money in hemoraging C, S and I. I now (finally) believe that the stock market will remain in a down or level state for an extended period of time (at least one year or more) and recently switched most of my existing money to F and G as well to avoid further losses.
Assuming that the G and F funds will produce approx 4% annual increase and that the C fund drops, say 25% in that same year but then will begin to come back up which is a better option for me:
Leave existing funds in the F and G (thereby making modest gains but avoiding large losses) but putting future allocations into C fund to take advantage of extremely low share prices and absorbing the losses for the next year. By getting "more bang for my buck" in the C Fund I will reap more benefit when it does rebound.
Keep both existing funds and future allocations in the F and G for the next year. When stock market begins to rebound switch back into C fund. I realize I won't be able to switch at bottom, but as long as switch is before C fund share price returns to where it was when I got out I will be better off.
My wife and I disagree - not on investing principles or what we think the market will do, but on the math involved. So assume that my assumption is correct; which would be the better course of action? Who has some even better advice?
Assuming that the G and F funds will produce approx 4% annual increase and that the C fund drops, say 25% in that same year but then will begin to come back up which is a better option for me:
Leave existing funds in the F and G (thereby making modest gains but avoiding large losses) but putting future allocations into C fund to take advantage of extremely low share prices and absorbing the losses for the next year. By getting "more bang for my buck" in the C Fund I will reap more benefit when it does rebound.
Keep both existing funds and future allocations in the F and G for the next year. When stock market begins to rebound switch back into C fund. I realize I won't be able to switch at bottom, but as long as switch is before C fund share price returns to where it was when I got out I will be better off.
My wife and I disagree - not on investing principles or what we think the market will do, but on the math involved. So assume that my assumption is correct; which would be the better course of action? Who has some even better advice?