PDA

View Full Version : Teflon: Good or Bad?



mlk_man
04-22-2005, 01:18 PM
A Sticky Situation

Teflon, the nonstick surface that made fat-free cooking easy for everyone, started life as an accident in the DuPont labs nearly 70 years ago. Scientists working on Freon refrigerants stumbled onto a new material that is considered the most slippery in the world. The first Teflon products hit the marketplace nearly 60 years ago, with their nonstick surface seemingly making foods healthier, since you could cook with virtually no oil or butter.

Several readers questioned the safety of Teflon. What about the chemical content of its cooking surface? Does it leach into the foods?

Coincidentally, Teflon's safety concerns resurfaced in January with a finding by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that exposure to a chemical used to make Teflon could possibly cause health risks. The chemical in question is perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and the concern arose because blood samples from three population groups taken at random showed low residue levels of PFOA. In another study, rats fed large doses of PFOA had delays in sexual maturation and accelerated mortality rates. It's important to remember, however, that these findings do not relate directly to Teflon -- they concern PFOA itself.

Facts About Teflon

To find out if cooking with Teflon pans still is considered safe, I talked with Christopher J. Portier, PhD, associate director, National Toxicology Program at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Unfortunately, the answer still isn't crystal clear. Dr. Portier doesn't say it isn't safe, but neither does he endorse it as completely risk free. The reason, he says, is that research on Teflon and PFOA is an emerging science, and that studies are in the beginning stages, even after all these years. Previous studies on the material took place before the substance was so ubiquitous in cooking. Now that it is in such widespread use, it may be having a larger impact.

Heat Factor

There is one definite health risk that is well documented about cooking with Teflon pans. When empty Teflon-coated pans are allowed to rise to high temperatures -- over 500°F -- the Teflon emits dangerous fumes. (Teflon pans were never meant to be used with high heat and are clearly labeled to that effect.) Picture this scenario -- the fumes emitted from Teflon killing pet birds. The closer the birds are to the kitchen, the more likely they are to die. When I first heard of this it sounded eerily reminiscent of canaries being sent into a mineshaft to determine air safety. I didn't think it was an issue, since people don't normally cook at such a high heat. Don't be so sure...

Since one of the culinary drawbacks of Teflon pans is that food will not brown in them, users all too often turn up the heat under a Teflon pan and walk away for a few minutes. This is all it takes, says Dr. Portier, to bring a pan up to the 500-degree danger zone. He cautions that if you see smoke coming from the pan -- assuming you have not put in oil -- it is far hotter than it was ever meant to be.

Chipped Teflon has been another rumored health risk, but Dr. Portier says there is no research that supports any special risk from this. Nevertheless, he feels it is prudent to replace chipped or scratched pans because there may be the possibility of a long-term hazard.

When pressed for further advice, Dr. Portier is hesitant to give a firm recommendation one way or the other about cooking with Teflon. His own pans are aluminum, but just because he likes to cook with them, not because he is worried about Teflon. (A side note about aluminum: The longer an acidic food sits in a pan at high temperatures, the greater the tendency for aluminum to be released as a salt into the contents. Don't store food in aluminum utensils or cook acidic sauces like tomato-based marinara in aluminum cookware.) Dr. Portier has a heavy iron skillet he likes for certain dishes, but he points out that it's possible the black residue that builds on the bottom of these pans might turn out to be a carcinogen. There's no proof on this yet, but he says, you never know -- so don't scrape the browned-bits into your food.

Keep the Teflon? Or start scrubbing sticky pans? I asked contributing editor Andrew L. Rubman, ND, what he uses. His reply: Cast iron with an enamel coating for cooking... stainless steel to boil water... and glass in the microwave.

As for Teflon, I go back to the concept of moderation. If used properly, Teflon still appears to be "okay." That said, I will use my Teflon pan as part of a varied cooking and food regimen that includes assorted cooking methods and pans.

mlk_man
06-30-2005, 12:04 PM
An update:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/HEALTH/conditions/06/30/epa.teflon.ap/index.html

mlk_man
12-13-2005, 06:35 AM
DuPont, EPA Settle Case On Chemical Disclosure


By Juliet EilperinWashington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 30, 2005; Page A05


Federal officials and the DuPont Co. have reached a settlement on charges that the chemical giant concealed possible harmful health effects associated with perfluorooctanoic acid, a chemical compound used to produce Teflon.



Lawyers on each side told Judge Barbara A. Gunning last week that they had agreed to settle the case but needed more time to assemble paperwork.
EPA spokeswoman Eryn Witcher said the agency "is still reviewing the terms of the agreement, and once the agency completes its review and files it with the Environmental Appeals Board, the agreement will be announced."

DuPont spokesman R. Clifton Webb, who has consistently said the company complied with federal disclosure laws, said, "We are not going to comment on the settlement, pending review by EPA's Environmental Appeals Board." The board is an internal review panel.

Environmental groups have called on federal officials to impose a hefty penalty on DuPont for not telling the government that PFOA can pass from a mother's blood to her fetus. The chemical has been linked to cancer and possible birth defects in animal studies.

"EPA should impose the maximum fine possible; $313 million is a small price to pay for polluting the blood of nearly every American with its indestructible cancer-causing Teflon chemical," said Richard Wiles, senior vice president for the Environmental Working Group, an activist group that has investigated the Teflon issue. "Anything less than the maximum fine will not deter DuPont and the chemical industry from future coverups."

mlk_man
12-13-2005, 06:43 AM
Is there an extra ingredient in nonstick pans?
By FSNET
Jul 27, 2005, 13:49




The question of whether Teflon cookware is safe has, according to this story, moved from Web site chatter to the courtroom, but scientists are also examining the chemical makeup of other products like food containers to gauge their potential hazards.

The story says that in each instance, the substance being questioned is perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA. Studies have shown that PFOA causes cancer and other health problems in laboratory animals, and it is under scrutiny by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration.

The Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit environmental research and advocacy organization financed by foundations including the Rockefeller, Family Fund and the Joyce Foundation, was cited as saying that items other than pans are likely to be the major sources of PFOA. But the group, along with many scientists, points out a different problem: an empty overheated Teflon-coated pan does pose a risk by releasing toxic fumes. DuPont does not dispute that, but there is no agreement between the company and Teflon's critics over what temperature releases the fumes. The Environmental Working Group says 325 degrees, or a medium flame; DuPont says 660 degrees.

DuPont tells consumers at its Web site that the fumes can injure pet birds and cause flulike symptoms in humans at "abnormally" high temperatures, a condition that the company says can last a couple of days. Other reports say that the fumes can kill birds.

The story says that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency began studying PFOA in 1999 and a draft report of its findings has been reviewed by an outside science advisory panel, which has said that PFOA is a likely human carcinogen. The E.P.A. disagrees and wants to describe it as a suggestive human carcinogen.

The story notes that the F.D.A. has looked at PFOA in microwaveable popcorn packaging and found that the chemical migrates to the oil from the packaging during heating. But George Pauli, associate director for science and policy in the office of food additive safety at the F.D.A., was cited as saying the levels found in the microwave packaging are low, adding, "We don't see anything at this time to say it's a safety issue. Food doesn't appear to be a major source."

Julie DeYoung, a spokeswoman for Phoenix Packaging, a division of ConAgra Foods, was quoted as saying,: "Studies on PFOA are preliminary, but we are taking the issue seriously and are talking with our paper suppliers about the issue. If the government tells paper suppliers to make changes, we'll support that."

ConAgra makes Orville Redenbacher's and Act II microwave popcorn and private label brands.

July 27, 2005
The New York Times
Marian Burros

Republished from FSNET with permission

KAPLOWD
12-13-2005, 01:11 PM
Here's a link on the teflon subject

http://www.mercola.com/2005/dec/13/dupont_pays_heavy_price_for_teflon_cover-up.htm