Tally for March '06

**FundSurfer** · 04-03-2006, 04:39 PM

Code:

 
                Last Qtr Last     Last
          Mar    & YTD   6 mon   12 mon 2005 Total
 
Leaders for Last 3 Months
 
Namor      1.82%   8.58%   7.50%  11.14%  #N/A
andy       3.58%   8.00%   9.17%  #N/A    #N/A
Phragman   3.33%   7.97%  #N/A    #N/A    #N/A
mailman6   2.84%   7.54%  #N/A    #N/A    #N/A
Fundsurf   2.50%   7.51%  #N/A    #N/A    #N/A
Wheels     2.91%   7.50%  #N/A    #N/A    #N/A
 
Leaders for Last 12 months
 
Showme     3.95%   5.74%  11.31%  21.07%  13.43%
Dakota     2.57%   6.68%  11.74%  20.92%  14.01%
Neirbod    3.06%   5.53%  10.13%  17.01%   8.91%
Cowboy     1.33%   6.04%  10.36%  16.05%  #N/A
Rokid      2.04%   5.90%   8.24%  15.58%   8.07%
TennisGu  -0.30%   1.69%   7.74%  15.34%  #N/A
Tekno      0.53%   5.55%   6.06%  14.31%  #N/A
mlk_man    3.42%   5.19%  14.09%  13.66%   8.68%
Pyriel     1.07%   4.20%   7.12%  13.34%   7.89%
Rod        1.63%   3.80%  11.08%  12.25%   7.56%
 
Leaders for March
 
sugarand   4.26%  #N/A    #N/A    #N/A    #N/A
nightlit   3.76%   6.41%  #N/A    #N/A    #N/A
Master     3.58%   4.49%  #N/A    #N/A    #N/A
RichC10    3.49%  #N/A    #N/A    #N/A    #N/A
Gilligan   3.47%   3.57%  #N/A    #N/A    #N/A
 
G-fund     0.36%   1.07%   2.25%   4.36%   4.49%
F-fund    -0.93%  -0.56%   0.01%   2.33%   2.40%
C-fund     1.29%   4.16%   6.33%  11.34%   4.96%
S-fund     3.84%   9.56%  12.31%  23.41%  10.45%
I-fund     3.33%   9.20%  13.38%  22.56%  13.63%
20% Each   1.58%   4.69%   6.86%  12.80%   7.29%

Attached text file has complete listing.

**Wheels** · 04-03-2006, 04:52 PM

I notice Andy is listed on the quarter leaders and that his March total is 3.58% but then he is not listed amongst the March leaders. What am I missing?

Dave
<><

**FundSurfer** · 04-03-2006, 04:58 PM

Originally Posted by Wheels

I notice Andy is listed on the quarter leaders and that his March total is 3.58% but then he is not listed amongst the March leaders. What am I missing?

Dave
<><

Yes, I should have mentioned that I only listed people once in order to show more people. It is top down. If they were listed in an upper table they were not available for a lower listing. Since I'm attaching the whole list, I should probably list just the top five in several categories and be done with it. I have not landed on a format for the Tally that I'm totally happy with. I'm always open to suggestions.

**Gilligan** · 04-03-2006, 05:07 PM

FundSurfer,
To me it looks like SHOW-ME should be #2 for the "Leaders for March" with a 3.95% return and bump me down. I do appreciate the work and time that you and M_M put in to make this happen.

Gilligan

**mlk_man** · 04-03-2006, 05:07 PM

Look at the 6-month return. I'm even beating the "trading goddess"!!!!! LOL

**Gilligan** · 04-03-2006, 05:13 PM

Originally Posted by FundSurfer

Yes, I should have mentioned that I only listed people once in order to show more people. It is top down. If they were listed in an upper table they were not available for a lower listing. Since I'm attaching the whole list, I should probably list just the top five in several categories and be done with it. I have not landed on a format for the Tally that I'm totally happy with. I'm always open to suggestions.

OK,
I just read your reply to Wheels. I guess I should ask questions first before I shoot.

**neirbod** · 04-03-2006, 05:43 PM

Originally Posted by FundSurfer

I have not landed on a format for the Tally that I'm totally happy with. I'm always open to suggestions.

Hi Fundsurfer,

First, thanks for all the work you put into this. It must be a beast to maintain.

I have a suggestion, since you asked. Overall I think this is a great presentation of a lot of data. But, I wonder if the policy of showing people only once is the best way to display the results? It would be simpler for you, and perhaps more informative for others, to just show the top performers for each time range. It would make the "top performers" tag easier to interpret. For example, I may ask "who did best in March?" Quickly glancing at your summary, I may miss that ShowMe had the 2nd best March, unless I carefully examine the table above it and note he was excluded from the "Top of March"
list because he was already on "Top 12 Months" list.

As a user, I am not sure what the advantage is to limiting each TSPer to only one "top performer" table.

Just food for thought. Thanks again for keeping up with this.

Dave

**mlk_man** · 04-03-2006, 06:51 PM

I just sent out the weekly tracker with the new allocations for each L fund and also included the monthly totals for everyone.

Sorry Fundsurfer, forgot to do that this time so I guess it meant more work for you....................

Happy returns,

M_M

**mlk_man** · 04-03-2006, 07:03 PM

Here are the L fund returns:

Last Qtr
Mar & YTD
L2040 1.98% 5.74%
L2030 1.77% 5.13%
L2020 1.54% 4.51%
L2010 1.18% 3.52%
L-Income .64% 2.01%

**mlk_man** · 04-03-2006, 07:06 PM

Doesn't like to post spaces so I can't make it look pretty.............

**FundSurfer** · 04-03-2006, 08:30 PM

Sounds like a consensus. Include top performers and don't worry about multiple listings.

I'm thinking that a standard listing might look like:

Top 5 for the month, Top 5 for the preceding 3 months, Top 5 for the year, and Top 10 for the previous 12 months.

I'm listing 10 for the prior 12 months because this seems to me to be a more useful list than the others. Opinions? I'm thinking that this would be the maximum number of list I'd like to do, if you'd like to see an additional list suggest which of the list I've suggested that you would delete.