They wouldn't be pushing it if they didn't think they could make more money of it...
More money for them = less money for us.
Interesting read. Barclays seem to be leading the way and has appeared to have been in contact with Congress to some small degree. Combo annuity and savings. Wave of the future?
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine...100_page_2.htm
CB
“Most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution.” - Huxley’s Brave New World
They wouldn't be pushing it if they didn't think they could make more money of it...
More money for them = less money for us.
Chem Eng,
That was my first impression also, I figure I'm going to get lucky and miss this improvement to our retirement package.But mid year and longer employees could be impacted, especially if it'll save the feds $$$. I know NSPS with the DOD is hurting our high 3's.
Thanks,
CB
“Most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution.” - Huxley’s Brave New World
I must be confused. Sounds very similar to our FERS 1% (annuity) plus TSP (savings). How is what they are proposing different in concept?
|
S&P 500 (C fund) 1d 5d 3m 6m 1y 2y | Dow Completion (S fund)
| EFA (I fund) 1d 5d 3m 6m 1y 2y | Bonds (F fund)
|
Bookmarks