Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Barclays betting heavily against our F Fund

  1. #1
    Braveheart is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    716

    Default Barclays betting heavily against our F Fund

    Just heard Barclays is betting huge against the 10 year note since April 2008 on Bloomberg. They are gambling big with junk bonds and pushing the yield up on the 10 year note.

    Since they are connected with our money all the L Funds and the F Fund that is a direct conflict of interest. They know how many Billions are in the L Funds and the F Fund every day. I will update with a link but that news just broke 10 minutes ago.
    Last edited by Braveheart; 05-05-2008 at 11:58 AM. Reason: add
    Keep me true to my best self, guarding me against dishonesty in purpose. Semper Fidelis


  2.  
  3. #2
    Braveheart is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    716

    Default Re: Barclays betting heavily against our F Fund

    Quote Originally Posted by Braveheart View Post
    Just heard Barclays is betting huge against the 10 year note since April 2008 on Bloomberg. They are gambling big with junk bonds and pushing the yield up on the 10 year note.

    Since they are connected with our money all the L Funds and the F Fund that is a direct conflict of interest. They know how many Billions are in the L Funds and the F Fund every day. I will update with a link but that news just broke 10 minutes ago.
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aNCksVzJxRZA

    Dealers Pare Treasuries, Signaling Fed Turning Point (Update1)

    By Daniel Kruger
    May 5 (Bloomberg) -- One word popped into Charles Comiskey's head as he watched investors seeking a haven from credit-market losses pile into Treasuries in March: ``Ridiculous.''
    The buying spree pushed yields to a five-year low even though rising commodity prices and a depreciating dollar were beginning to spark inflation. The co-head of Treasury trading at HSBC Securities USA Inc. has so far been proven right. U.S. government debt has lost 2.8 percent since March 17, including reinvested interest, according to New York-based Merrill Lynch & Co. indexes.
    ``Rates got ridiculous,'' said Comiskey, who is based in New York and started trading in 1989.
    The U.S. units of London-based HSBC Holdings Plc, Barclays Plc of London, Deutsche Bank AG in Frankfurt and the other 17 primary dealers that trade with the Federal Reserve have compiled a $101.4 billion bet against Treasuries, data compiled by the central bank show. That's the most since the week ended Nov. 14, just before yields on 10-year notes climbed half a percentage point over the following month.
    Dealers have used any demand ``as an opportunity to move Treasuries off their balance sheets,'' Comiskey said.
    The $101.4 billion represents the amount of Treasuries that dealers are using to hedge other positions and is up from $58.3 billion in the week ended March 12, Fed data show. The more they use to hedge, the bigger the wager against Treasuries.


    BARCLAYS & THE F Fund & L Funds

    The U.S. units of London-based HSBC Holdings Plc, Barclays Plc of London, Deutsche Bank AG in Frankfurt and the other 17 primary dealers that trade with the Fed have compiled a $101.4 billion bet against Treasuries, data compiled by the central bank show. That's the most since the week ended Nov. 14, just before yields on 10-year notes climbed half a percentage point over the following month.
    The bet represents the amount of Treasuries that dealers are using to hedge other positions and is up from $58.3 billion in the week ended March 12, Fed data show. The more they use to hedge, the bigger the wager against Treasuries.
    Last edited by Braveheart; 05-05-2008 at 12:31 PM. Reason: add
    Keep me true to my best self, guarding me against dishonesty in purpose. Semper Fidelis

  4.  
  5. #3
    luv2read's Avatar
    luv2read is offline Planet TSP
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,010

    Default Re: Barclays betting heavily against our F Fund

    from June 27 last year:

    U.K. banking giant Barclays said it has some exposure to troubled hedge funds that invested in the subprime mortgage market, but any loss from the exposure won't be material to its overall performance. The statement followed reports that it had made significant loans of around $300 million to two Bear Stearns hedge funds that are now near collapse.

    We all know how that turned out. Anybody still have any doubts as to Barclays being at the root of the IFT limits?

    FRTIB give us a straight answer. Are our funds at risk? Backtalk about 105% collateral is bs. 105% of zero is still zero.

  6.  

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
S&P 500 (C fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Dow Completion (S fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m 
EFA (I fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Bonds (F fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y