|
|
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
From the Federalist #8:
There is a wide difference, also, between military establishments in a country seldom exposed by its situation to internal invasions, and in one which is often subject to them, and always apprehensive of them. The rulers of the former can have a good pretext, if they are even so inclined, to keep on foot armies so numerous as must of necessity be maintained in the latter. These armies being, in the first case, rarely, if at all, called into activity for interior defense, the people are in no danger of being broken to military subordination. The laws are not accustomed to relaxations, in favor of military exigencies; the civil state remains in full vigor, neither corrupted, nor confounded with the principles or propensities of the other state. The smallness of the army renders the natural strength of the community an over-match for it; and the citizens, not habituated to look up to the military power for protection, or to submit to its oppressions, neither love nor fear the soldiery; they view them with a spirit of jealous acquiescence in a necessary evil, and stand ready to resist a power which they suppose may be exerted to the prejudice of their rights. The army under such circumstances may usefully aid the magistrate to suppress a small faction, or an occasional mob, or insurrection; but it will be unable to enforce encroachments against the united efforts of the great body of the people. In a country in the predicament last described, the contrary of all this happens. The perpetual menacings of danger oblige the government to be always prepared to repel it; its armies must be numerous enough for instant defense. The continual necessity for their services enhances the importance of the soldier, and proportionably degrades the condition of the citizen. The military state becomes elevated above the civil. The inhabitants of territories, often the theatre of war, are unavoidably subjected to frequent infringements on their rights, which serve to weaken their sense of those rights; and by degrees the people are brought to consider the soldiery not only as their protectors, but as their superiors. The transition from this disposition to that of considering them masters, is neither remote nor difficult; but it is very difficult to prevail upon a people under such impressions, to make a bold or effectual resistance to usurpations supported by the military power. I always liked reading the Federalist Papers. It explains so much about how and why we became a separate nation. The founders envisioned a small army defending against invaders. I don't think they would approve of us being the invaders of other nations. What's so troubling is that when a lot of conservatives read this, they only pick and choose the ideas. Most definitely don't quote this piece, and I don't wonder why. The founders of our nation were always uncertain about how much authority they wanted to concede to the President. Recently, there was a leak of the documents that described the troop levels "needed" in Afghanistan. If I were the Congress, and the administration, I would pursue that one to the ends of the earth to discover how and why this information was leaked. It would be "most" revealing. |
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail;
Failure to Comply, 5 Years in Prison...
__________________
Tom - Market Commentary | Site Map | Sentiment Survey System | My Blog | ETF Talk |
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
Check out CSPAN live someone is trying to delay the vote, a real fight between the DEMS and REPS. I think the DEMS don't have the votes and are trying to put off the vote?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is one of the things that concerns me a bit-maybe not so much immediately, but would potentially have increasing impact on real post-tax income for middle class. The closer I get to retirement 10 years from now, the more impact there would be. The way I understand it, impacts would be similar to stagflation.....someone please explain to me if I have that all wrong.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...170939688.html
__________________
"The two most powerful warriors are patience and time"-Tolstoy |
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
Now the GOP is countering with using the same delaying ploy, How do they ever get anything done?
|
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
ObamaCare: What Gov't Will Require You to Do - Betsy McCaughey, WSJ
|
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() CB
__________________
The public option is nothing more than a foothold to the liberals' ultimate goal of government provided and run healthcare. ~ Viva La Migra |
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sec. 305 (p. 189) Provides for automatic Medicaid enrollment of newborns who do not otherwise have insurance.
Sounds good to me. |
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
|
Obama delivers remarks prior to the House health-care vote
Courtesy of the White House Saturday, November 7, 2009 2:19 PM PRESIDENT OBAMA: Good afternoon, everybody. I just want to say a few words about the landmark vote that the House of Representatives is poised to take today -- a vote that can bring us one step closer to making real the promise of quality, affordable health care for the American people. For the better part of a year now, members of the House and the Senate have been working diligently and constructively to craft legislation that will benefit millions of American families and millions of American businesses who urgently need it. For the first time ever, they've passed bills through every single committee responsible for reform. They've brought us closer than we have ever been to passing health insurance reform on behalf of the American people. Now is the time to finish the job. The bill that the House has produced will provide stability and security for Americans who have insurance; quality, affordable options for those who don't; and lower costs for American families and American businesses. And as I've insisted from the beginning, it is a bill that is fully paid for and will actually reduce our long-term federal deficit. This bill is change that the American people urgently need. Don't just take my word for it. Consider the national groups who've come out in support of this bill on behalf of their members: The Consumers Union supports it because it will create -- and I quote -- "a more secure, affordable health care system for the American people." The American Medical Association and the American Nurses Association support it on behalf of doctors and nurses and medical professionals who know firsthand what's broken in our current system, and who see what happens when their patients can't get the care they need because of insurance industry bureaucracies. The National Farmers Union supports this bill because it will control costs for farmers and ranchers, and address the unique challenges rural Americans face when it comes to receiving quality care. And the AARP supports it because it will achieve the goal for which the AARP has been fighting for decades -- reducing the cost of health care, expanding coverage for America's seniors, and strengthening Medicare for the long haul. Now, no bill can ever contain everything that everybody wants, or please every constituency and every district. That's an impossible task. But what is possible, what's in our grasp right now is the chance to prevent a future where every day 14,000 Americans continue to lose their health insurance, and every year 18,000 Americans die because they don't have it; a future where crushing costs keep small businesses from succeeding and big businesses from competing in the global economy; a future where countless dreams are deferred or scaled back because of a broken system we could have fixed when we had the chance. What we can do right now is choose a better future and pass a bill that brings us to the very cusp of building what so many generations of Americans have sought to build -- a better health care system for this country. Millions of Americans are watching right now. Their families and their businesses are counting on us. After all, this is why they sent us here, to finally confront the challenges that Washington had been putting off for decades -- to make their lives better, to leave this country stronger than we found it. I just came from the Hill where I talked to the members of Congress there, and I reminded them that opportunities like this come around maybe once in a generation. Most public servants pass through their entire careers without a chance to make as important a difference in the lives of their constituents and the life of this country. This is their moment, this is our moment, to live up to the trust that the American people have placed in us -- even when it's hard; especially when it's hard. This is our moment to deliver. I urge members of Congress to rise to this moment. Answer the call of history, and vote yes for health insurance reform for America. Thanks. |
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
..seems a bit casual and out of character for a President after a Speech.![]()
__________________
“Tolerance is composed of nine parts of apathy to one of brotherly Love” (90% F) |
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
|
Now they have to deal with the Senate, best of luck on that one!!!
![]() If it does pass the Senate it won't be the same Bill in the end and that could be GOOD!! 23_28_125.gif |
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
|
We'll see where this ends up. I own that it may not be the same bill, and reconciliation may change a lot in it, particularly when so many Senators are one the insurance industry payroll. They've been that way for many many years. The opposition is well funded, and they have the support of a lot of people that have an agenda against the current administration. Next year may bring a lot of structural changes to the US government, I hope.
It seems we're able to spend trillions on stupidity, but hardly a dime on common sense. Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have served to empty the national treasury, squandering our children's future, and helping only to create enormous problems for us and the rest of the world. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Obama on Health Care | James48843 | Politics | 548 | Yesterday 07:16 PM |
| Obama's Health Care Plan | nnuut | The Economy | 51 | 09-06-2009 06:42 AM |
| The Great Health Care Debate | James48843 | News and World Affairs | 30 | 06-22-2009 02:49 PM |
| Health Care Debate | James48843 | Politics | 16 | 05-06-2009 11:59 PM |
| Guard/Reserve Health Care | James48843 | Military TSP Talk | 0 | 09-15-2007 02:48 AM |
|
S&P 500 (C fund) 1d 5d 3m 6m 1y 2y |
Dow Completion (S fund) |
EFA (I fund) 1d 5d 3m 6m 1y 2y |
Bonds (F fund) |