http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...=latin_america
The media is picking up on Obrador now and watching him as the July 2 election nears.
If he wins -- and it looks likely -- it will certainly have something to do with the lack of any improvement in the area of immigration with the Colossus of the North.
Vicente Fox could have helped his compatriots had some progress been made in that area, but nothing has happened there since 9/11. Things have actually gotten worse since then concerning immigration and its reform.
Obrador's plan of increased spending on social welfare is a waste; for most in Mexico sneaking across its northern border is the premier social welfare program, i.e. a job in America. How Obrador can achieve that kind of success by governmental spending is a mystery; it will be like throwing pesos out the window.
There shouldn't be that much concern, though, about that slight left turn in Mexico. Past news reports state that relations between Mexico and Venezuela/Chavez aren't good. And neither are relations between Mexico and Cuba/Castro. That won't change with Obrador's probable win.
Obrador is not a Chavez-Castro radical, but that social welfare spending would be damaging enough, but not damaging on a scale like a Mexico-Venezuela-Cuban entente ... that would be a nightmare. Throw in Boliva with the other three and that would be worse than a nightmare. And what blumders can America make as a nation to send that disaster in motion?
Mexico and Mexicans have to stay out of such things if it wants to progress. Really, the best social welfare plan Obrador could get would be to work a deal to send more of his people to work in the Northern Colossus, so they could send more of their $$ to their families in the homeland. Their pay is already being cut by paying into a Social Security fund that they won't get a dime out of.
Some may argue about illegals tapping into social services that are supported by American tax dollars, e.g. medical care in hospital emergency rooms, schools, etc. But such things can be worked out. For example -- just for a (big) idea (watch out now) -- could it not be feasible to get an actual count of "undocumented" Mexicans working here, and then make a deal to get a discount on the oil we import from there? Say, for a 25% break on the cost of a barrel of oil, we will work out a deal to allow these "undocumented" workers free access to American employment, schools and emergency rooms -- the break in oil price commensurate to the number of "undocumented" workers here?
Chances are such arrangements would best be worked out LOCALLY where the "undocumented" populations are the greatest. Can one imagine, say, Chicago working out a deal with the Mexican government to allow undocumented workers to do their thing in Chicago and provide ER services and maybe public schooling for them, say, in a deal that would lower gasoline prices in Chicago by 25%?
It's an idea.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote
Bookmarks