Well I read something interesting today, but I am not sure if it is true. I have been thinking about limiting my IFT's anyway, but this really got me thinking. Someone said that the S&P averaged 12% a year for the past 20 years, but if you missed the 40 biggest days in that span you only saw a 3% return. Does anyone think that is correct? If so then missing those big days would really kill a return. But I guess by the same measure, I wonder what the return would be if you sidestepped the 40 biggest loses during that time.
Just an interesting thing I heard that I thought I would share since it provoked a lot of thought in me.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks