Thread: SEX, DRUGS AND ...OIL? New recruiting/retention tool

Hats turned to the side and Boxers hanging out. They be represent'n sum'tn.
Wusup wid dat ? Looks like some hommies who fled the Bureau of Prisons.
AND I don't mean staff ! The Selective Hiring Process at its best.
Nahhhhh, I'm just peeved they never invited me to the party !
Although the guy to gal ratio is looking a little weak for my
normal party standards !

Department Interiors singggerrrssss!

What do we do with the drunken Sailor, So oily in the morning?
Make him the Captain of the Exxon Valdez
Put mine on the rocks!

[Not my lyrics, can't find the citation]

Give him a job at the Interior department
And we'll make him a consultant pronto
Put mine on the rocks!

I would echo Luv2read's sentiments regarding another picture:

Some should never have been posted to begin with.


It was a catchey tittle though

Sorry Steady, I disagree on this one. I see nothing wrong with this...it's posted in The Lounge which is the proper "fun" forum...not in member's threads where we go for TSP information. It's also not cut/pasting a political figure's head on a photo of someone else's physical assets that serves no purpose and worse, discredits her. Someone obviously photoshopped it, but it tells it like it is. DOI needs to take their lumps, they're earned. Time to clean house.

You mean its not real ? POOOOH !

Just mention Sex and watch the "page view" numbers rise
quicker then the cost of gas in the middle of hurricane season !

Originally Posted by luv2read

Sorry Steady, I disagree on this one.

Hum...well of course you're right Luv2read and a disagreement with me would be short lived.

In my feeble manner - I was simple noting that certain pictures are hugely inappropriate. If one is downgrading a woman "because she is a woman" - that is wrong. It takes from her true character and reduces her to a "slut holding a rifle".

This does the same thing with the DOI - and I see no difference in the message the picture conveys. To me both are demeaning and inappropriate.

Sorry for referencing "YOU" - that was wrong and short sighted.

In the framework of my argument - I thought they protrayed the same message.

BUT IN ALL SERIOUSNESS - IT WOULD BE RARE YOU AND I WOULD DISAGREE ON THE CENTRAL UNDERLYING CORE.

LOL SB! Planning a career as rehired annuitant at another "fun" agency? I looked for that on a few blogs so but couldn't find it so figure it was either photoshopped or removed.