Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 14

Thread: Does Volatility Hurt Real Returns?

  1. #1
    rokid is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    931

    Post imported post

    Does volatility hurt returns? Yes!

    Most of us calculate average return to determine how well our investments are doing. In addition, we use the arithmetic average of a series of annual returns to determine how well we’ve done over a number of years.

    In fact, we should also calculate the annualized return. The annualized return takes volatility into account.Annualized return is our real return and is always less than the annual return. Annualized return is what we can actually spend.

    For example:

    Years 2000-2004
    Average Standard Annualized Compound
    Annual ReturnDeviation Return Return

    Tom 4.62 22.582.77 1.15
    S&P 500 -.75 20.26 -2.34 .89
    *60/40 Stocks/bonds 3.34 12.262.78 1.15
    *20% each fund 3.37 13.662.68 1.14
    100% G Fund 5.044 0.935.041 1.28

    * Passive allocation without rebalancing

    Note for eachportfolio example, the annualized return is less than the average annual return. In addition, although Tom’s average annual return is 1.28 percent higher than the 60/40 allocation, his annualized return is a hair lower (.01 percent) because of his portfolio’s higher level of volatility.The S&P 500's annualized return (-2.34) is also significantly worse than its average annual return (-.75) because of its high level of volatility. In contrast, the G Fund's annual and annualized returns are almost identical because of the G Fund's low level of volatility.


    Finally, the “Compound Return” represents the 2004 nominal value of a dollar invested in 2000 for each of the portfolios. Tom's and the 60/40 allocation's compound returnsare identical at 1.15, closely followedby the 20% each fund1.14 compound return.

    Conclusion: Return and volatility count - not just return. The higher the volatility the greater the gap between annual return (what everyone reports) and annualized return (the real return thateveryone spends).




    Last edited by rokid; 03-21-2007 at 01:27 AM.


  2.  
  3. #2
    Guest

    Post imported post

    Rokid...

  4.  
  5. #3
    tsptalk's Avatar
    tsptalk is online now Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    10,836
    Blog Entries
    620

    Post imported post

    rokid wrote:
    Conclusion: Return and volatility count - not just return. The higher the volatility the greater the gap between annual return (what everyone reports) and annualized return (the real return thateveryone spends).
    Excellent explanation rokid. Thanks!

  6.  
  7. #4
    Pete1 is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    208

    Post imported post

    Thanks for posting this, Rokid. A wonderful piece of analysis. I have saved the worksheet for future reference.

  8.  
  9. #5
    rokid is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    931

    Post imported post

    Thanks guys and WW. I glad you found it interesting/useful.

  10.  
  11. #6
    tennisguy's Avatar
    tennisguy is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    , Texas, USA
    Posts
    114

    Post imported post

    If you don't mind can you explain to me how you get those numbers. And why are the annualized returns are your real returns instead of your annual return.
    Thanks
    Tennisguy

  12.  
  13. #7
    rokid is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    931

    Post imported post

    tennisguy wrote:
    If you don't mind can you explain to me how you get those numbers. And why are the annualized returns are your real returns instead of your annual return.
    Thanks
    Tennisguy
    Tennisguy,

    What I tried to say is that your annualized return (geometric mean) is your real average return over a number of years. Your average annual return. i.e. arithmetic mean of your annual returns, is not.

    For example, if you calculate the compound return using Tom's actual annual returns, you get a factor of 1.15. In other words, if Tom invested a dollar in 2000, he had $1.15by the end of 2004. In contrast, someone who went 100% C Fund through the period2000-2004, had $.89by the end of 2004. Clearly Tom did better.

    However, if you assume Tom's average return over the period 2000-2004 was 4.62% (arithmetic mean), you would be incorrect. If your use 4.62% to calculate the compound return over the period 2000-2004, you get 1.25, which is incorrect. If, on the other hand, you use Tom's annualized return, 2.77%, you get the correct compound return.

    The only interesting point about all of this is that volatility counts. If you have zero volatility, your annual average return =s your annualized return. However, any volatility causes the two to diverge. The greater the volatility, the greater the divergence between your average annual return and your annualized return. Finally, as previously stated, the annualized return is your real average return and is always less than or equal (no volatility) to your average annual return. Therefore, one of an investor's strategies is toreduce returnvolatility.

    Examine the cells in the attached spreadsheet for more info. I updated it to show the difference in compound returns (correct vs incorrect).

    Finally,I used Excel’s geomean function to calculate the annualized return.

    I hope that helps.:^



    Last edited by rokid; 03-21-2007 at 01:27 AM.

  14.  
  15. #8
    Pete1 is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    208

    Post imported post

    Here is another rather simplistic illustration. Two individuals have average annual returns of 10% per year. Investor A's returns are: year 1+30, year 2-10, year 3+30, year 4 -10. Investor B's returns are: +10, +10, +10, +10. Both have average annual returns of +10 but who has more money? Answer - Invesor B.

    Assume both start year one with $100000. Results after 4years:

    Investor A: end of year one = $100000 x 1.3 = $130000,end of year two = $100000 x .9 = $117000, end ofyear 3 = $117000 x 1.3 = $152100, end of year four = $152100 x .9 = $136890.



    Investor B: end of year one = $100000 x 1.1 = $110000, end of year two = $110000 x 1.1 = $121000, end of year three = 121000 x 1.1 = $133100, end of year four = $146410.

    Both have average returns of 10% but the less volatile portfolio puts more food on the table.

  16.  
  17. #9
    Mike's Avatar
    Mike is offline Club TSP
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    1,286

    Post imported post

    That is probably why they tell even young investors to have *something* in bonds to balance out the aggressive holdings. Not only does that reduce overall risk, but it also knocks down the volatility a bit.




  18.  
  19. #10
    tennisguy's Avatar
    tennisguy is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    , Texas, USA
    Posts
    114

    Post imported post

    Thanks guys , I understand a whole lot more now.
    Tennisguy

  20.  
  21. #11
    charmedboi82 is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Of course, you can't average an average. It's extremely misleading. Thankfully, I learned this in seventh grade from a crazy (seriously) teacher.

  22.  
  23. #12
    rokid is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    931

    Default

    Charmedboi82,

    I'm not sure what your point is. I don't see where anyone on this thread said anything about averaging an average. However, you can take the average of a set of averages. For example, the average of 30 daily temperatures for the month can yield an annual monthly temperature.

    Anyway, the discussion was about average returns, which don't take volatility into account, and annualized/geometric returns which do. Annualized returns are actually the average compound return over a period. Annualized returns are always lower than average returns. In addition, the greater the volatility, the greater the difference between the average return and the annualized return.

  24.  
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
S&P 500 (C fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Dow Completion (S fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m 
EFA (I fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Bonds (F fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y