Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 34

Thread: L-Funds the way to go?

  1. #1
    biggdog1's Avatar
    biggdog1 is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    DERBYTOWN, Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    293

    Default L-Funds the way to go?

    I have just noticed from Tom's new spreadsheet for 06 that if you had invested in the L-Funds this would be your return for this year to date:

    L40 1.71% How many did this good the last two weeks?
    L30 1.49% Or this?
    L20 1.31% Huh!
    L10 1.07% Possibly!
    LINC 0.59% More likely!

    Makes you wonder if the TSP gurus might be right.


  2.  
  3. #2
    TiCKed's Avatar
    TiCKed is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by biggdog1
    I have just noticed from Tom's new spreadsheet for 06 that if you had invested in the L-Funds this would be your return for this year to date:

    L40 1.71% How many did this good the last two weeks?
    L30 1.49% Or this?
    L20 1.31% Huh!
    L10 1.07% Possibly!
    LINC 0.59% More likely!

    Makes you wonder if the TSP gurus might be right.
    It's a well worn adage that "buy and hold" of a well diversified portfolio is the best way to go for the majority of people....(myself included). I'm sure you've heard that most actively managed mutual funds fail to out-perform index funds?

    That said, there are some smart people here who put a lot of time and effort into doing REAL analysis of trends and history. They can, (and have) out performed some of the commonly used allocations, including the L funds. As long as you go into it knowing that you MIGHT fail in the endeavor, and as long as you enjoy the pursuit, I don't see anything wrong with the attempt!

    I personally don't like the allocations in the L funds, so I built my own...and left a little lee-way for fun, and potential profit. Right now, I'm slightly ahead of L40, more by accident than anything else. But the L funds are the perfect "hands off" solution for people who just don't want to think about their TSP account.

    I think the lesson is important, though. Playing games isn't the right thing to do with your TSP account...but thoughtful analysis and playing the percentages isn't a mistake if understand the drawbacks, and if you enjoy it.

    Tom

  4.  
  5. #3
    biggdog1's Avatar
    biggdog1 is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    DERBYTOWN, Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    293

    Default

    Tom, I agree. I also prefer dabbling with my own money. I was only pointing out when it looks as though the market sours, it may be a possible investment to use if you can't watch daily. I'm sure most of us got caught with our pants down this week and it was strange that "those L-Funds" done that well. We all should have taken notice when the Nicky took its hits earlier.

  6.  
  7. #4
    rokid is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    931

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by biggdog1
    I have just noticed from Tom's new spreadsheet for 06 that if you had invested in the L-Funds this would be your return for this year to date:

    L40 1.71% How many did this good the last two weeks?
    L30 1.49% Or this?
    L20 1.31% Huh!
    L10 1.07% Possibly!
    LINC 0.59% More likely!

    Makes you wonder if the TSP gurus might be right.
    Good call! I just crunched the 2006 TSP Tracker numbers. The average return was .61%. The median return was .66%. The L40 return beat 69% of the TSPers. The LINC return beat 49%.
    Last edited by rokid; 01-22-2006 at 12:39 PM.

  8.  
  9. #5
    Mike's Avatar
    Mike is offline Club TSP
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    1,286

    Default

    For once, I'm on the right side of the comparison.

  10.  
  11. #6
    Cortez's Avatar
    Cortez is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    169

    Exclamation

    My YTD return is better than the L Funds. 60C 40S until 1/12 close and 100 G since. 3.70%. I probably will end up tanking to negative by Feb 1 for putting this in writing. Knock on wood. Not gonna try catching any knives on C, S or I in the next few days.

  12.  
  13. #7
    biggdog1's Avatar
    biggdog1 is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    DERBYTOWN, Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    293

    Default

    An update for the L-Funds to date:
    L-40 3.77
    L-30 3.33
    L-20 2.92
    L-10 2.22
    L-Inc 1.10

    For those that don't want to play. YTD I'm setting 2.07%.

  14.  
  15. #8
    saturneptune's Avatar
    saturneptune is offline TSP Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    70

    Default

    Retirement is 2 or so years away. I am in L2010 100%. It is very difficult for me to stay in the G fund. With all the negative comments about the future of the C, S and I fund, I am beginning to wonder if I am doing the right thing.
    Any thoughts appreciated.

  16.  
  17. #9
    bkrownd's Avatar
    bkrownd is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hilo Town, East Hawai'i
    Posts
    202

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TiCKed
    I'm sure you've heard that most actively managed mutual funds fail to out-perform index funds?
    One thing I always wonder when hearing this comment is that actively managed mutual funds usually target specific market segments or investment strategies. They're not usually intended to perform well in all market conditions at all times, but rather to follow a specific segment, without "style drift". You're supposed to buy and sell them as conditions favor or disfavor the fund's strategy. Comparing a targeted fund (intended as a variable component of a flexible or speculative portfolio) with an index fund (intended as a permanent base of a fixed buy-and-hold portfolio) doesn't seem to make much sense.

    I think the L funds are fine, and IMO should be the default TSP investment for newbies. However I don't use them myself since I have a lot of my investments outside of TSP. When I rebalance my total portfolio I emphasize the strongest funds offered by each company/plan.


  18.  
  19. #10
    Pete1 is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    208

    Default

    Saturneptune,

    Negative comments about C, S, I basically equate to a bear market mentality. So, are we in a bear or bull market? Nobody really knows. Members can speculate about where stocks and bonds are headed but they do not know what the market will do tomorrow, this year, or even the next 5 years. How can you best position your investments for the near term and the long term? I have long advocated that members hold a balanced portfolio of stocks and bonds. By holding one of the L funds, you have achieved this objective. If you are uncomfortable with the potential of a 20%loss this year, the 50/50 mix of L2010 may be too aggressive for you. Consider L income instead - the maximum loss for the 20/80 mix of L income is around 5%. If you cannot tolerate any loss, stick with the G fund. Anyone holding 100% equities should be prepared for a 50% loss in any given year. Of course, most bail out before that and never find the right time to get back in. Holders of balanced portfolios avoid this trap by staying invested at a level of risk that they are comfortable with. See "The Intelligent Asset Allocator" by William Bernstein for very good, very practical asset allocation advice. Also, Rick Ferri's new book "All About Asset Allocation."

  20.  
  21. #11
    biggdog1's Avatar
    biggdog1 is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    DERBYTOWN, Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    293

    Default

    Once again the market kicks our butt Thursday and Friday. The week only had one up day for me. L-Fund YTD update:
    L-40 2.74%
    L-30 2.41%
    L-20 2.21%
    L-10 1.68%
    LInc 0.84%

    To date I'm setting 1.39% YTD !

  22.  
  23. #12
    rokid is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    931

    Default

    SaturnNeptune,

    Based on historical returns, the L 2010 Fund should provide an average return of 8.4% with a standard deviation of 8.4%. Therefore, statistically, 95% of the time, the L Fund return should fall between -8.4% and +25.2%. Over ten years, that works out to a +124% return.

    On the other hand, historically, the G Fund has provided an average return of 5.75% a year with a standard deviation of 1.09%. Therefore, statistically, 95% of the time, the G Fund return should fall between +3.57% and +7.93%. Over ten years, that works out to +75% return.

    Finally, inflation has, historically, averaged 3% or +34% over a ten year period.

    There's risk no matter what you do.
    Last edited by rokid; 02-06-2006 at 08:53 AM.

  24.  
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
S&P 500 (C fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Dow Completion (S fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m 
EFA (I fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Bonds (F fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y