Isn't it interesting II, that nobody responds to your truthful comments.
The billion dollar cancer industry likes pushing radiation into sensitve breast tissue that can now easily become cancerous from the radiation. Lets not talk about how vitamin D and having a proper ratio of omega 6:3 ratio will prevent and reverse cancer. people rather be scared to death by the chemo doctors which will kill most in 3-6 months faster than the cancer would kill the person if diet is not changed.
Lets not talk about the latest research for the last 10yrs has been that all sickness, disease and cancer is caused by an underlining inflamation of the body tissues. Not enough omega 3 fats is one cause on inflamation.
www.drday.com
www.naturalnews.com
www.dadamo.com wrong foods per blood type cause inflamation.
"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other." John Adams 10/11/1798
Please let her know that's not good for the RSD and you'll probably need to lightly and lovingly carry her down.
Also make sure you tell her that many of the Posts and Threads are sometimes displayed for their 'shock value' -- and that's what sparks some lively discussions.
Let her know the bright side about 'stress' and times like this are what makes those cruises so much more enjoyable and that you've got some plans in the making....
that will get her smiling and things should improve....:toung:
This is Excellent !! Valkyrie
Many are finally comming to the light -- and by that hopefully the trend towards healty lifestyles and 'nature' will increasingly eliminate both the need for Pharmaceuticals and Doctor visits.
We're also seeing this in the Salmon --- with 40 dams a year being destroyed and letting 'nature' be as it should. Going from 3,000 to 390,000 and all 5 species comming back strong.
Thanks for the links! I had forgotten about the www.dadamo.com one. The girl I just started dating is type O and just like the site states, she has thyroid and stomach issues. We'll be changing her diet right away. Amazing how accurate it is................
Subscriber info: Intrepid Timer Premium Talk | System Signals posted here l FAQ about email alerts l
Thanks for the blood type web site. I don't know if I believe all that or not. My sister an RN, told me about this theory years ago. I'm big into vitamins and herbs, which I believe help alot. The treatment of cancer has been quite a disaster for years; however is getting better. I think it really depends on the type of cancer you get. I've known several personally who have gottten it and died rather soon. I would have to think wether I would go thru the treatments or not.
Earlier I said this:
I just went back and read that breast exam data more carefully.They said that self-exam had a very low detection rate compared to clinic exam (in a doctor's office), and that the only two studies that had been done on self-exam showed statistically that it was inferior to the other options, and caused more harm than good.
It basically boils down to this- it is clear from the two studies that they reviewed (the only two available to them, neither of which was done in the United States, but rather in other countries) that there WAS a statistically significant difference between detection rates when done by a medical professional, and a person doing a self-exam. The data showed that self-exam actually had a very, very poor detection rate, when compared to a doctor doing it in the office, OR compared to a mamogram.
So, I got an idea.
What we REALLY need to do, is raise the proficiency level of breast examinations. Instead of just pushing self-examinations, perhaps we need to train and deploy a cadre of specially trained para-professionals experienced in checking every nook and cranny, looking for anything out of the ordinary.
A sort of "Peace-Corps" set of volunteer trained breast inspectors.
Heck- I think maybe we can even do our own study. I'll get the training set up, and then advertise my services as a para-professional breast inspector, and volunteer to test each and every potential person myself. Kind of like a "First Responder" that is highly trained.
What do you think? Can we gather enough volunteers for to create a force of para-professional breast inspectors to try this out? Maybe we need some badges, and a black bag, to project just the right image....
Last edited by James48843; 11-19-2009 at 08:49 PM.
oooo, under any other circumstances your last sentence or two would be funny as hell..but James, I think this was not in very good taste at all...this IS a rather touchy subject you know...
A wise man speaks when he has something to say...A FOOL speaks when he just has to say something
I've known women in their 20s and 30s that found a lump with self examiantion and it saved their life. Have you ever known someone that died with breast cancer, it is one horrible way to go. For Christs Sake find it early.
Oh lordy, here we go again. I can see it now.
A few days ago the group issued new recommendations of breast cancer screening, and everyone went nuts.
This morning- they issued new recommendations on cervical cancer screening- PAP smears- and recommended fewer of them, based on the scientific data.
I can see the arrows flying already.....
----------------------------------------------------------
New cervical cancer screening guidelines released
By Saundra Young, CNN Medical Producer
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The new mammogram recommendations out earlier this week caused quite an uproar. Now comes another change in screening tests for women -- this one for cervical cancer.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) releases new guidelines Friday, saying women don't need their first cervical cancer screening -- or Pap test -- until they're 21 years old. And, they don't need followup examinations as often as previously recommended.
According to the guidelines, women younger than 30 should be screened every two years, instead of annually. Women 30 or older can be examined once every three years.
"The tradition of doing a Pap test every year has not been supported by recent scientific evidence," said Dr. Alan G. Waxman, who developed the document for ACOG's Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. "A review of the evidence to date shows that screening at less frequent intervals prevents cervical cancer just as well, has decreased costs, and avoids unnecessary interventions that could be harmful."
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/11/20...er.guidelines/
so no more checkin out
Attachment 7300
and no more cervical exams
?anyone got a pic for this one?
next will be the prostrate thing
?don't want to see that one?
some of my best recollections come from playing doctor, now it's good luck finding one who will accept your plan.
where are we headed?
c'mon buster i know you got the file storage capacity for this one.
happy thanksgiving.
100g
S&P500 (C Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
EFA (I Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
BND (F Fund) (delayed) (Stockcharts.com Real-time) |
||
Yahoo Finance Realtime TSP Fund Tracking Index Quotes |
Bookmarks