Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

  1. #1
    FundSurfer's Avatar
    FundSurfer is offline Club TSP
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Surfing, USA
    Posts
    1,649

    Default House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

    A House subcommittee voted Tuesday for a 3.5 percent average salary increase for civilian federal employees, echoing actions in both the House and Senate to raise pay for military service members by that amount next year.
    Last month, the full House voted in favor of a 3.5 percent military pay raise in approving the fiscal 2008 Defense authorization bill.
    On May 24, the Senate Armed Services Committee passed its version of the bill, which also contained a 3.5 percent increase for the military.

    Full story at Government Executive.com:
    http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cf...id=37116&sid=2
    A distribution of monkeys throwing darts to choose their allocations would likely have produced a higher performer ...-Desperado ... My Account & My Account Talk


  2.  
  3. #2
    ChemEng is offline Club TSP
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    AL
    Posts
    1,335

    Default Re: House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

    Anyone on NSPS know how this is going to work for those in paybands instead of position grades?

    Were converting in November and there are still some questions (like this one) that havent been answered...

  4.  
  5. #3
    charmed855's Avatar
    charmed855 is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    397

    Default Re: House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

    Quote Originally Posted by ChemEng View Post
    Anyone on NSPS know how this is going to work for those in paybands instead of position grades?

    Were converting in November and there are still some questions (like this one) that havent been answered...
    We converted in Apr and were told that pay/cost of living adjustments were not impacted by performance. Locality pay can be withweld in rare cases. You're basically competing for pooled shares of step increases and performance awards that you would have receive in the old system.

  6.  
  7. #4
    MADDOG's Avatar
    MADDOG is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    PEACH COBBLER, GA
    Posts
    974

    Default Re: House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

    being in nsps since jan; i know a little;
    i don't know how everyone else is rated;
    we use to be evaluated up to 81 here.
    however the new ratings will only go up to 5.
    no one gets a 5
    4 virtually are unheard of
    2-3 are normal and
    1 you won't get your cola raise;
    at least that the way i under stand it

    depending on the number of objectives you have
    example
    obj 1 = 3 points
    obj 2 = 2 points
    obj 3 = 3 points
    obj 4 = 2 points
    obj 5 = 2 points

    12 total points divided by 5 objectives = 2.4 avg
    then you look at the handy dandy chart to see how many "shares"
    shares are kinda like percentages.

    hope this helps;
    just don't get a 1 and you'll get your cola raise

    md

  8.  
  9. #5
    DCguy's Avatar
    DCguy is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    310

    Default Re: House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

    well I, DCguy, get 4.49% raise this year.

    http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1007/101107pb.htm

  10.  
  11. #6
    charmed855's Avatar
    charmed855 is offline TSP Talker
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    397

    Default Re: House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

    Quote Originally Posted by DCguy View Post
    well I, DCguy, get 4.49% raise this year.

    http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1007/101107pb.htm

    And you'll need every bit of it living there. I shouldn't tease because I'll probably end up working there one day.

  12.  
  13. #7
    hessian's Avatar
    hessian is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    982

    Default Re: House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

    Here's a couple of current events - articles about governmental "Continuing Resolutions" (CR), BOTH ENTIRELY REAL!.. both just as goofy.
    DC politics at their best!

    1) The House of Representatives has passed a bill to extend funding the federal government's operations from Dec 14th until December 21st (yes that is fully completed CR for the just current week!!).
    http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/...007-12-13.html

    2) After this, Bush suggested that: "they should not carry the unfinished business of 2007 into the new year," he suggested - He might endorse for a full-year CR to be passed (if they can't get to an agreement) - that would be an entire year without "pork" for either side- imagine that!
    http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cf...dcn=todaysnews

    Bush: "Instead they should pass a one-year continuing resolution that does not include wasteful spending or higher taxes." Bush said any spending package approved this year should be "clean" legislation "without gimmicks, without policy riders that could not be enacted in the ordinary legislative process."
    Last edited by hessian; 12-15-2007 at 11:54 PM.

  14.  
  15. #8
    Silverbird's Avatar
    Silverbird is offline Planet TSP
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Occoquan, VA
    Posts
    2,420

    Default Re: House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

    Quote Originally Posted by hessian View Post
    Here's a couple of current events - articles about governmental "Continuing Resolutions" (CR), BOTH ENTIRELY REAL!.. both just as goofy.
    DC politics at their best!

    1) The House of Representatives has passed a bill to extend funding the federal government's operations from Dec 14th until December 21st (yes that is fully completed CR for the just current week!!).
    http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/...007-12-13.html

    2) After this, Bush suggested that: "they should not carry the unfinished business of 2007 into the new year," he suggested - He might endorse for a full-year CR to be passed (if they can't get to an agreement) - that would be an entire year without "pork" for either side- imagine that!
    http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cf...dcn=todaysnews

    Bush: "Instead they should pass a one-year continuing resolution that does not include wasteful spending or higher taxes." Bush said any spending package approved this year should be "clean" legislation "without gimmicks, without policy riders that could not be enacted in the ordinary legislative process."
    Oh, and he wants the war funding now, without rasing any revenue to pay for it. Hokay...
    "All the prophets of Doom, Can always find room, In a world full of worry and fear..." - Protest Song, Monty Python

  16.  
  17. #9
    James48843's Avatar
    James48843 is online now TSP Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,069
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: House panel backs 3.5 percent civilian pay raise

    Note-

    the 2009 January GS Scale Pay Raise was passed by the Senate as part the Continuing Resolution- H.R.2638 this weekend-

    It is now sitting on the President' desk for signature.

    The number in law is now 3.9% for 2009- rather than the 3.4% the President asked for.

    We can assume the President will sign- he has not indicated veto of the continuing resolution, and it wouldn't be good to have a fight about that today.

    Now, the President will have to decide how to divy that 3.9% up.

    If he follows past tradition- it should be about a 2.9% across the board increase, and then varible locality pay increases this year.

    Payable the first full pay period in January for GS employees.


  18.  

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
S&P 500 (C fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Dow Completion (S fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m 
EFA (I fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Bonds (F fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y