View Poll Results: are you a member of a union?

Voters
35. You may not vote on this poll
  • dues paying union member

    9 25.71%
  • collective bargaining position but elect not to join union

    8 22.86%
  • federal worker in a series not covered by a union

    5 14.29%
  • federal manager not allowed to join a union

    3 8.57%
  • retired/no longer employed by federal government

    10 28.57%
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 47

Thread: federal unions

  1. #1

    Default federal unions

    Taxpayers foot bill for union work, lawmakers seek changes | Fox News

    According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 939,000 federal workers belonged to a union in 2014. Another 139,000 were covered by collective bargaining agreements, but weren't in a union. That brings the total number of employees covered by the unions to 31.6 percent of the total federal workforce. Hice -- who will introduce legislation in the House Thursday to limit "official time" -- doesn't think it's fair that the other 68 percent of federal employees are doing government work every day, while some of their union colleagues are getting paid to not do the work they were hired for.
    i'm curious, how many here are dues paying union members? covered by a collective bargaining unit but don't pay dues? in a series not represented by a union?
    100g


  2.  
  3. #2

    Default Re: federal unions

    There are some craft who need to be represented by the Union or their rights will be abused.
    Some management can be ignorant of the rights of the workers and some do respect these rights.
    There are some bad union members and officials who abuse this right of representation.
    I can't seem to find an appropriate ending for my discourse...so I'll just leave it hanging until I can think of a better ending...
    Emotions should never play a role in one's investing strategy!
    No to Greed...No to Fear!
    http://share.robinhood.com/mariloc1

  4.  
  5. #3

    Default Re: federal unions

    I'm a manager who was at one time who was the Chief Steward for our local.

    I'm no longer a member but, I respect the union's position, know the Master Agreement very well and abide by it. The problem that I see is people who see their position in both management as well as in the union as a platform to inflict pain onto the other party.

    I personally feel that becoming a manager was a mistake on my part so late in my career. The human behavior, especially the vindictiveness that I have witnessed is appalling.

    Frank

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

  6.  
  7. #4

    Default Re: federal unions

    Quote Originally Posted by Lakebound View Post
    I'm a manager who was at one time who was the Chief Steward for our local.

    I'm no longer a member but, I respect the union's position, know the Master Agreement very well and abide by it. The problem that I see is people who see their position in both management as well as in the union as a platform to inflict pain onto the other party.

    I personally feel that becoming a manager was a mistake on my part so late in my career. The human behavior, especially the vindictiveness that I have witnessed is appalling.

    Frank

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    Sounds like my career, I took the early out in 2012 because I couldn't deal with the lies from either side.

  8.  
  9. #5

    Default Re: federal unions

    Quote Originally Posted by gegor View Post
    Sounds like my career, I took the early out in 2012 because I couldn't deal with the lies from either side.
    I'm seriously thinking about writing a book about leadership and management based solely on what I have witnessed as a manager.

    Frank

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

  10.  
  11. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boiled Peanut, Georgia, USA
    Posts
    76,521

    Default Re: federal unions

    I was a second level supervisor for 13 years a BRAC closed the facility. I was transferred to another base but not as a supervisor, I was a much happier employee for the rest of my career. The union helped sometimes and hindered the others.



  12.  
  13. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Stinking desert valley of bad air quality, AZ
    Posts
    2,994

    Default Re: federal unions

    Taxpayers foot bill for union work, lawmakers seek changes | Fox News

    I believe that the union representatives concerning myself represent us on their own time. I may be mistaken. The unions finally mentioned in the last paragraph of the article are not mine and Maricar19 is correct that some Craft employees are regularly abused by management because management thinks everyone is a general schedule employee. Management has no clue about bargaining agreements for Craft employees and equivalent pay.

    The unions mentioned in the last paragraph of the link seem more concerned with how many square feet of workspace and what kind of telephone the worker has.

    Management seems more concerned with bonuses and promotion.

    As stated before in other posts management has no clue about the lower level day to day things that their part of the fed machine does nor do they care about it or who keeps it going. Until part of it malfunctions.

    PO

  14.  
  15. #8

    Default Re: federal unions

    Quote Originally Posted by PessOptimist View Post
    Taxpayers foot bill for union work, lawmakers seek changes | Fox News

    I believe that the union representatives concerning myself represent us on their own time. I may be mistaken. The unions finally mentioned in the last paragraph of the article are not mine and Maricar19 is correct that some Craft employees are regularly abused by management because management thinks everyone is a general schedule employee. Management has no clue about bargaining agreements for Craft employees and equivalent pay.

    The unions mentioned in the last paragraph of the link seem more concerned with how many square feet of workspace and what kind of telephone the worker has.

    Management seems more concerned with bonuses and promotion.

    As stated before in other posts management has no clue about the lower level day to day things that their part of the fed machine does nor do they care about it or who keeps it going. Until part of it malfunctions.

    PO


    Unless one has been living in a cave, its quite obvious what is going on here.

    The agreement to let union officers (local stewards, regional chairs, etc) a day a week (or pay period) to work on labor issues has been a law for over 35 years. Never any problems with that for all that time

    The unions at the regional/national level fight to negotiate many of our federal benefits and fair labor standards (Pension, Health Care, OT and Comp Time).

    One political party (not to be named since this is not a political thread) have declared a holy war Fatwah on federal employees, wanting to drastically cut pension benefits, cut FEHB, prevent COLA's, maybe reduce leave in the future.

    The unions at the national level are the only ones fighting for fed employee rights, lobbying congress and the WH on our behalf.

    Those in Congress who want to burn federal employee benefits to the ground want to weaken federal unions, so they can more easily achieve their task.

    That's all that's going on here.
    Last edited by FireWeatherMet; 04-05-2015 at 11:36 PM.
    CURRENTLY 30% C, 20% S and 50% G (as of COB 04/11/2024) 1st April IFT

  16.  
  17. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boiled Peanut, Georgia, USA
    Posts
    76,521

    Default Re: federal unions

    Same Old, Same Old, Same Old, while the Liberals are kissing Butt the Repubs are doing the hard work, the stuff that is risky, not another Give Away!




  18.  
  19. #10

    Default Re: federal unions

    Quote Originally Posted by FireWeatherMet View Post
    Unless one has been living in a cave, its quite obvious what is going on here.

    The agreement to let union officers (local stewards, regional chairs, etc) a day a week (or pay period) to work on labor issues has been a law for over 35 years. Never any problems with that for all that time

    The unions at the regional/national level fight to negotiate many of our federal benefits and fair labor standards (Pension, Health Care, OT and Comp Time).

    One political party (not to be named since this is not a political thread) have declared a holy war Fatwah on federal employees, wanting to drastically cut pension benefits, cut FEHB, prevent COLA's, maybe reduce leave in the future.

    The unions at the national level are the only ones fighting for fed employee rights, lobbying congress and the WH on our behalf.

    Those in Congress who want to burn federal employee benefits to the ground want to weaken federal unions, so they can more easily achieve their task.

    That's all that's going on here.
    I'm going to make your mind explode here. I agree with you on this one. It's politics, plain and simple. I was a national union officer for five years. It's necessary to have people on official time to negotiate on our behalf. If Congress wants to authorize a modified closed shop, where people are charged a small amount per pay period for the representation the unions provide, the unions could hire full time representatives and the volunteers could go back to their jobs. They won't do that, though.
    God bless the United States of America!

  20.  
  21. #11

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,885
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default Re: federal unions

    Quote Originally Posted by Viva_La_Migra View Post
    I'm going to make your mind explode here. I agree with you on this one. It's politics, plain and simple. I was a national union officer for five years. It's necessary to have people on official time to negotiate on our behalf. If Congress wants to authorize a modified closed shop, where people are charged a small amount per pay period for the representation the unions provide, the unions could hire full time representatives and the volunteers could go back to their jobs. They won't do that, though.
    Right. Most don't know the history of the labor movement. Why it was needed in the first place. Now the plan is to pit employee against their union. Old school union busting.

    With so many soon-to-become-management stewards/officers "representing" employees; combined with a general ignorance of the labor movement: I'm afraid the ongoing union busting will accelerate.
    [COLOR=#0000ff][FONT=comic sans ms][I]"In the land of idiots, the moron is King."--Unknown[/I][/FONT][/COLOR]

  22.  
  23. #12

    Default Re: federal unions

    Quote Originally Posted by nnuut View Post
    Same Old, Same Old, Same Old, while the Liberals are kissing Butt the Repubs are doing the hard work, the stuff that is risky, not another Give Away!
    Nope. I agree with FWM on this one. Big difference between a 'Gives Away' and a negotiated fair work environment. I a dues paying member.

    Look at any work environment and you will find employees that fall anywhere from lazy to hard workers. Look at any work environment and you will see management that are SOB's to fair. Look at unions and you will see greed to fair representation for better work environments. It's unfair to say Unions are the sole issue.

    Keep on on taking from me. Keep on stripping my benefits. Keep limiting my Union representation. All while coddling those that refuse to get into the workforce... Now that's F'd up.

  24.  
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
S&P500 (C Fund) (delayed)
federal unions
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed)
federal unions
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
EFA (I Fund) (delayed)
federal unions
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
BND (F Fund) (delayed)
federal unions
(Stockcharts.com Real-time)

Yahoo Finance Realtime TSP Fund Tracking Index Quotes