
Originally Posted by
CountryBoy
Budnipper,
I've been searching for confirmation of the funding removal, but have yet to find any mention or link. Of course this is just one of many welfare earmarks embedded stealthily in a hugh INFRASTRUCTURE stimuls package, but it looks, smells and walks like a huge welfare bailout for the unproductive, at our costs.

CB

Originally Posted by
CountryBoy
No mention of the STD funding one way or the other in this article, but highway infrastructure gets a whopping 3% and BHO couldn't believe it was that small. Infrastructure rebuilding could go on for decades. Our infrastructure is decades old and falling apart. The COE alone has years of infrastructure backlog, that Congress won't fund.
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/i.../30/177021.htm CB
["Inhofe says he personally met with President Barack Obama Monday to point out that the $30 billion earmarked for infrastructure represents only 3 percent of the total amount of the spending bill. “When I told him that, he didn't believe it was that small a percentage,” Inhofe says. ”I said, ‘If we find that I'm right and you're wrong, would you go up to 10 percent?’ And he said, ‘I'd certainly look at that.’ Since then, he realizes that I am right. As far as roads and highways, it's $30 billion, and then a few [dollars] for water infrastructure.” Inhofe believes it is the infrastructure improvements that could provide real jobs, while spurring the economy."]
CB, Inhofe sounds like a man with common sense to me.
I'm not familiar with his record, except for a google-look just now.
So far, I read that he uses terms like "hoax" and "scam" while
discussing global warming.

He supports Israel, as well. What's
not to like! Sadly, it's unlikely that BHO will listen to him.
I'm still huntin' for a clue about the STD funding issue. I don't
really think I'll find it though.

Bookmarks