Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Testimony on new TSP REIT fund

  1. #1
    TSPAlaska is offline Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Fairbanks, Alaska, USA
    Posts
    2

    Post imported post

    I ran across this article in FedNews Online...

    *****BOARD MEMBERS ADDRESS ISSUE OF ADDING REAL ESTATE TO TSP*****
    http://www.fednews-online.com/article.pl?id=7787&d=20050421

    On Tuesday, two members of the Federal Retirement Thrift Savings Board
    spoke to the House Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce and Agency
    Organization, addressing the problems posed by the possible addition of
    a Real Estate Stock Index Investment Fund to the Thrift Savings Plan.

    Board Chairman Andrew Saul reported the new fund proposed in H.R. 1578
    would establish an index fund exclusively comprised of Real Estate
    Investment Trust securities, which the Board has determined to be "the
    wrong fund at the wrong time" for TSP. Saul stated that:


    * Investment policy should not be developed one fund at a time on a
    case-by-case basis. Sound investment policies can only be developed
    comprehensively
    * Investment policy should not be developed without considering
    fundamental plan design issues. The Board is well aware of the arguments
    for overweighting in risk-optimized portfolios, yet including REITs
    would represent a departure from the broad asset classes TSP offers that
    have been endorsed by Congress in the past
    * The Board believes that it is essential to focus participants'
    attention on the Lifecycle Funds that will be introduced this summer


    The Board unanimously recommends against the addition of an REIT fund at
    this time, stressing that consideration must be given to the
    appropriateness and investability of any new type of investment, how
    well that type of investment complements the current mix of investment
    funds, and how it compares with other possible additions or deletions.

    The REIT proposal is based on the view that investors could achieve more
    diversification by holding a higher percentage of REIT securities than
    currently provided in the existing funds. Saul pointed out several
    classes of assets that currently have no representation in TSP
    investment options and deserve equal consideration to REITs if
    additional funds are to be established.

    Gary Amelio, the Board's executive director, testified that the Board
    had sought advice from major investment consultants, banks, and mutual
    fund managers. All of these organizations affirmed that the current TSP
    fund menu offered adequate diversification and that additional funds
    were not required. Several organizations stated that the current TSP
    fund options offered ideal diversification.

    Amelio also stressed that adding an REIT fund would result in
    significant expenses for all program participants, including those who
    choose not to participate in the new fund.

    "Some TSP participants have demonstrated a tendency to chase returns,
    which could likely result in higher turnover rates for such a fund and
    higher transaction costs. Education efforts to counter such behavior are
    costly and ineffective. Restrictions on the size and/or frequency of
    interfund transfers complicate administration of the Plan and would
    negatively affect all TSP participants." Amelio said.

    The Board members concluded their remarks indicating that they intend to
    obtain additional information and conduct careful analysis.



  2.  
  3. #2
    rokid is offline Team TSP
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    925

    Post imported post

    It makes me wonder about the TSP board. Every one of their assertions is incorrect. In addition, I’d like to know what ‘experts’ they consulted about the adequacy of the currently available fund choices.

    REITs would not drive up expenses. Vanguard's REIT fund expenses are .03% higher than their S&P index fund, i.e. hardly significant. In any event, if expensesbecame an issue, TSP could charge higher expenses for more expensive to operate funds - like all other mutual fund families!

    If the board were truly concerned about participants chasing returns, they would provide a broader mix of non-correlated funds to support more effective “buy and hold” diversification and increase, from zero, investor education. Specifically, REITS, emerging markets, and precious metals would be very effective diversifiers for the C, S, and I funds. In addition, since REITS pay taxable dividends, they are particularly appropriate for tax deferred accounts, e.g. TSP.

    The resistance to any new funds appears to be more about not being able to "walk and chew gum" at the same time. The key quote is "* The Board believes that it is essential to focus participants' attention on the Lifecycle Funds that will be introduced this summer". In other words, TSP is introducing the L Funds and doesn't want the complication of any introducing, or even thinking about, any other new funds. However, without effective investor education, the L Funds just become additionalfunds to trade in and out of.

    End of rant! Have a great weekend!:^

  4.  
  5. #3
    Guest

    Post imported post

    I remember back some time before June '04 reading about the creation and the hiring for 3-4 new positions for the TSP board. I remarked to a co-worker that this alarmed me (I am naturally suspicious, particularly of the Bush Administration). I see here in the above posts a possible relationship of my instinctive alarm and what may occur to the structures of our TSP program.

    PS Just conjecture

  6.  

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
S&P 500 (C fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Dow Completion (S fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m 
EFA (I fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y
Bonds (F fund)
[Chart]
1d  5d  3m  6m  1y  2y