View RSS Feed

TSP Talk Blog

Breakout or pullback?

Rate this Entry

10/14/11


Stocks closed mixed yesterday but closed well off of their lows as the Dow lost 41-points after having been down over 140 at one point.


For the TSP, the C-fund slipped 0.29% yesterday, the S-fund was up 0.03%, the I-fund added 0.02%, and the F-fund (bonds) gained 0.30%.


The S&P 500 closed above the 50-day EMA for a 4th consecutive day, which is a real good sign, and almost completes my 3 to 5 day rule of not trusting a breakout until we see it hold for 3 to 5 days. Day number 4 would be enough except S&P nearly gave it up yesterday as it pulled back to test the 50-day EMA and is close enough to easily move below it. I think we will know today or Monday if it is going to hold, as the chart looks ready to rollover.

If it can rally in the face of several indications that it should pull back, I think the bulls will be in charge. Otherwise, we will see the S&P back below the 50-day rather quickly.


Chart provided courtesy of www.decisionpoint.com, analysis by TSP Talk

We are seeing these tail formations (red circles) all over the charts and Wednesday's negative tail might indicate a short-term top at the top of the trading range, so yesterday's positive tail, which found support at the 50-day EMA, will have to battle Wednesday's negative tail before we see if the bulls or bears will be able to claim victory.

The Nasdaq pulled back modestly early to fill a gap left open on Wednesday. It is now above the 200-day EMA, a very nice sign, but it is also overbought and at the top of its trading range.


Chart provided courtesy of www.decisionpoint.com, analysis by TSP Talk

Here are a couple of overbought / oversold type indicators that I watch and you can see that in the short-term, the S&P 500 looks a little "toppy" compared to prior peaks.


Chart provided courtesy of www.decisionpoint.com, analysis by TSP Talk

It's been another interesting week; one that has so far seen the bulls take charge again, but the weakness late Wednesday afternoon and into Thursday morning has many of our indicators pointing down, while the charts test the overhead resistance. Today (Friday) could resolve the short-term dilemma, although the longer-term is really starting to look better. More on that next week.


The TSP Talk Sentiment Survey came in at 42% bulls, 46% bears, for a bulls to bears ratio of 0.91 to 1. That is a neutral reading in a bear market which means the system will remain 100% G Fund for next week.

Thanks for reading! Have a great weekend!

Tom Crowley


The legal stuff: This information is for educational purposes only! This is not advice or a recommendation. We do not give investment advice. Do not act on this data. Do not buy, sell or trade the funds mentioned herein based on this information. We may trade these funds differently than discussed above. We use additional methods and strategies to determine fund positions.

Submit "Breakout or pullback?" to Digg Submit "Breakout or pullback?" to del.icio.us Submit "Breakout or pullback?" to StumbleUpon Submit "Breakout or pullback?" to Google

Comments

  1. James9779's Avatar
    With the market going up, more people get excited about buying stocks. I would think you would see a lot of bears converting over to the bull side, so why is the sentiment survey keeping people in the G-Fund of all places with it paying very modest interest?
  2. CallMeIshmael's Avatar
    Tom -

    I appreciate your analyses, which always give me as many questions as answers (a good thing, I think, when trying to follow the markets). Regarding the "longer term," which you'll get to next week, I have a question you might want to help us with.

    I've been looking at the weekly charts, and notice a disconnect between the S&P 500 and DJIA on the one hand, which have stayed below their 50-wk moving average these past 10 weeks, and NASDAQ, which has straddled it each of the last 7 weeks and closed at or above it 3 of the past 5 weeks. The Dow's and S&P's present highs do not get above where they were during peaks in April and Nov. last year, which we may interpret as resistance, and are still almost 5% below the lows of March and June this year, which may signal even more resistance. But throughout this whole 10-week bear market NASDAQ's weekly highs have been well ABOVE its April 2010 highs and AT the November 2010 highs (higher than April's on the NASDAQ) pretty much every week. It easily cut thru the March and June 2011 lows without the least resistance, and is now 8% ABOVE those lows. It's only 3-4% below its 10-yr. high of July. Also, the S&P and Dow keep straddling their 200-wk MA (is that an important line?) while the NASDAQ bounced off the space 5% above it, never reaching it.

    So what gives here? How do we read the charts TOGETHER? NASDAQ looks bullish -- IS bullish (unless it peaks out now and forms a 6-mo head and shoulders portending an even bigger fall to come). But the other two are iffy, their iffiness being the involved subject of these blogs. Does the NASDAQ represent the newer economy, the innovator, the natural leader, making it a better fortune-teller than the charts of the more established economy, which will (we hope) follow? Does it all depend on whether the market is moving from bear to bull or vice versa, with different charts representing the leaders at different times? If NASDAQ is not the leader here, how do we explain why it is doing so much better? Looking at the weekly charts alone, I'd almost think the NASDAQ and S&P 500 didn't relate to the same market.

    Call Me Ishmael
  3. tsptalk's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by James9779
    With the market going up, more people get excited about buying stocks. I would think you would see a lot of bears converting over to the bull side, so why is the sentiment survey keeping people in the G-Fund of all places with it paying very modest interest?
    We're probably too close to the bottom to have convereted enough bears to the bullish side. I am only seeing the light myself, that this rally could be more than a move to the top of the trading range. Give this rally another week or two and the bullish numbers will be well over the 1 to 1 ratio.
  4. tsptalk's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by CallMeIshmael
    Tom -

    I appreciate your analyses, which always give me as many questions as answers (a good thing, I think, when trying to follow the markets). Regarding the "longer term," which you'll get to next week, I have a question you might want to help us with.

    I've been looking at the weekly charts, and notice a disconnect between the S&P 500 and DJIA on the one hand, which have stayed below their 50-wk moving average these past 10 weeks, and NASDAQ, which has straddled it each of the last 7 weeks and closed at or above it 3 of the past 5 weeks. The Dow's and S&P's present highs do not get above where they were during peaks in April and Nov. last year, which we may interpret as resistance, and are still almost 5% below the lows of March and June this year, which may signal even more resistance. But throughout this whole 10-week bear market NASDAQ's weekly highs have been well ABOVE its April 2010 highs and AT the November 2010 highs (higher than April's on the NASDAQ) pretty much every week. It easily cut thru the March and June 2011 lows without the least resistance, and is now 8% ABOVE those lows. It's only 3-4% below its 10-yr. high of July. Also, the S&P and Dow keep straddling their 200-wk MA (is that an important line?) while the NASDAQ bounced off the space 5% above it, never reaching it.

    So what gives here? How do we read the charts TOGETHER? NASDAQ looks bullish -- IS bullish (unless it peaks out now and forms a 6-mo head and shoulders portending an even bigger fall to come). But the other two are iffy, their iffiness being the involved subject of these blogs. Does the NASDAQ represent the newer economy, the innovator, the natural leader, making it a better fortune-teller than the charts of the more established economy, which will (we hope) follow? Does it all depend on whether the market is moving from bear to bull or vice versa, with different charts representing the leaders at different times? If NASDAQ is not the leader here, how do we explain why it is doing so much better? Looking at the weekly charts alone, I'd almost think the NASDAQ and S&P 500 didn't relate to the same market.

    Call Me Ishmael
    Hi CMI -

    The 200 bar moving average is important on the weekly chart and the fact that we are seeing the S&P get back above it is one reasons for my longer term bullishness. I'd like to see the market work off the short term overbought levels first.

    The Nasdaq is a leading index, just behind the Dow Transportation Index, so if they are outperforming, look for the other indices to follow.

    The Nasdaq represents tech, which usually benefits earlier in a recovery. The Transports are very sensitive to the economic environment as increases or decreases in shipping is one of the first signs that things are improving or worsening.

    But yes, seeing the Naz outperform is a good sign that the bear market may have bottomed.
  5. RealMoneyIssues's Avatar
    Breakout I guess... What I don't understand is why... there is absolutely no sane reason why this market is continuing to go up. I am sure BT is happy as a Bull in flowers, but seriously, how can anyone NOT believe that there is some serious manipulation going on; period.
  6. tsptalk's Avatar
    The fundies come out in the charts first.
  7. Birchtree's Avatar
    When the market was correcting there was no sane reason for it to get oversold. The market looks to the future. The 200 SPX EMA will fall on Monday and many managers will wait on the golden cross for confirmation that the bull has returned. I'm buying everything that stinks - that's how I function.

S&P500 (C Fund) (delayed)

(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed)

(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
EFA (I Fund) (delayed)

(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
BND (F Fund) (delayed)

(Stockcharts.com Real-time)

Yahoo Finance Realtime TSP Fund Tracking Index Quotes