View RSS Feed

Scribbler's Macroeconomic View

TSP Newsletter Claptrap, Economist Claptrap Can Both Hurt

Rate this Entry
The January/February TSP newsletter arrived in the mail a few days ago. Many of you probably received it as well "TSP Highlights" and the letter from TSP accompanying the annual statement.

In my opinion, both are complete and utter rubbish. Take Highlights -- which exults the benefits of dollar cost averaging as a method to mitigate risk. This proposed risk mitigation strategy has been an immense failure -- but the theory need not be based on observable fact, but on mere faith. It is as if the market were a gambler, and the investor were the casino -- after many iterations, the probabilities are on your side, so pay no attention if you lose in the "short term". It is nothing more than espousing a philosophy of laziness, and it should be treated as such and completely disregarded.

I try to focus on the macroeconomy as primary driver -- which it is. The macroeconomy drives revenue lines which is directly reflected in profitability of corporations. But I have become extremely disenchanted with major insititution economists. Rather than the logical progression of economic factors affecting business conditions, and therefore profitability, economists from major institutions seem to focus more on projecting an economic scenario that makes the recommendations of that institutions stock analysts seem viable. Not a new problem, I know -- but it has become more bothersome to me recently. It is troubing to see projections that are not based on evidence stir up people into investing for the turn, only to see them lose another 9% in short order.

Submit "TSP Newsletter Claptrap, Economist Claptrap Can Both Hurt" to Digg Submit "TSP Newsletter Claptrap, Economist Claptrap Can Both Hurt" to del.icio.us Submit "TSP Newsletter Claptrap, Economist Claptrap Can Both Hurt" to StumbleUpon Submit "TSP Newsletter Claptrap, Economist Claptrap Can Both Hurt" to Google

Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Bullitt's Avatar
    I'm beginning to believe more and more that it's all about the stock market. If the market is going up, the economy will follow.

    Did any economist really predict this mess? I mean really predict it. The guys who've been advising to buy gold the past 10 years don't count because they are like broken clocks. The ones who are calling for collapses now, it just blows my mind that these are the brightest minds in the room. If they missed this haymaker, how can we be so confident they're going to catch the next left hook?
  2. Scribbler's Avatar
    No economist can really predict these type things, but a good economists with a knowledge of markets and capital structure could have predicted that an economic contraction would have a large impact on equities.

    Things don't change just because they seem to have changed. Housing issues surfaced long before the market tanked. People just were not looking for it. People need to critically think -- think -- about developments and their impacts going forward, and take the time to look around. The days when someone could just buy dips and comfort themselves with trite phrases such as "stocks are on sale" weren't doing this -- they weren't thinking. They were just adhering to the norm. After all, those sayings must be true, because so many people said it -- smart people, wise people, educated people, well-compensated people. But the adages of the masses is no substitute for thinking.

    The economy leads the market, contrary to how things seem right now. The economy will continue to slow as a natural consequence of credit destruction -- but this too shall pass. We will be stronger because of it -- perhaps as a society we have too few Charlie Buckets and too many Veruca Salts. But the only thing we have to notice right now is that there is a bias toward decreasing values for equities due to the economic contraction. There is nothing we can do can change it so -- especially when the paternal TSP system provides only limited "index choices" -- we must just get out of the way. We have to look for the opportunity for the economics to improve before the markets -- but take notice of the economics without an observational bias toward that improvement, as "jumping the gun" can prove very costly.

S&P500 (C Fund) (delayed)

(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
DWCPF (S Fund) (delayed)

(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
EFA (I Fund) (delayed)

(Stockcharts.com Real-time)
BND (F Fund) (delayed)

(Stockcharts.com Real-time)

Yahoo Finance Realtime TSP Fund Tracking Index Quotes